诡异dblink问题解决–dblink insert操作数据类型发生改变

1.展示列属性

[oracle@saas-xunzhi-db1 ~]$ sqlplus testga/testga

SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu Jan 12 16:26:56 2012

Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.


Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options

SQL> desc t_xifenfei;
 Name                                      Null?    Type
 ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
 PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID                       NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
 STATUS_NEW                                         NUMBER
 PACKAGE_NAME                                       VARCHAR2(50)

SQL> desc wf_proc_inst@oldmoa
 Name                                      Null?    Type
 ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
 ID                                        NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
 NAME                                               VARCHAR2(500)
 PROC_ID                                   NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
 PARE_INST_ID                              NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
 PARE_ACTI_ID                              NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
 INST_CREATOR                                       VARCHAR2(40)
 CREAT_DATE                                         DATE
 STATUS                                             CHAR(1)
 ATT1                                               NUMBER(10)
 ATT2                                               VARCHAR2(255)
 SEQVALUE                                           VARCHAR2(50)

从这里可以看出,原表的status列是char,而目标表的STATUS_NEW列是number类型

2.通过dblink查询列值

SQL> select t.inst_id as ID,
  2         case w.status
  3           when '0' then
  4            4
  5           when '2' then
  6            3
  7           else
  8            1
  9         end as  status_new,
 10         p.name as PACKAGE_NAME
 11    from wf_proc_inst@oldmoa i
 12    left join wf_proc_info_inst@oldmoa t on t.inst_id = i.id
 13    left join wf_proc_type@oldmoa p on t.type_id = p.id
 14    left join wf_proc_inst@oldmoa w on t.inst_id = w.id
 15   where t.inst_id = i.id
 16     and t.proc_id <> 53
 17     and t.is_ok = 1
 18     AND t.inst_id <= 4837 
 19     AND t.inst_id>=4735;

        ID STATUS_NEW PACKAGE_NAME
---------- ---------- --------------------------
      4755          3 呈批处理
      4836          3 公文处理

从这里可以看出来,case工作正常,传入的char类型,通过case转换为number类型

3.使用dblink插入数据并查询

SQL> INSERT INTO t_xifenfei
  2  select t.inst_id as ID,
  3         case w.status
  4           when '0' then
  5            4
  6           when '2' then
  7            3
  8           else
  9            1
 10         end as  status_new,
 11         p.name as PACKAGE_NAME
 12    from wf_proc_inst@oldmoa i
 13    left join wf_proc_info_inst@oldmoa t on t.inst_id = i.id
 14    left join wf_proc_type@oldmoa p on t.type_id = p.id
 15    left join wf_proc_inst@oldmoa w on t.inst_id = w.id
 16   where t.inst_id = i.id
 17     and t.proc_id <> 53
 18     and t.is_ok = 1
 19     AND t.inst_id <= 4837 
 20     AND t.inst_id>=4735;

2 rows created.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL> col package_name for a10
SQL> select * from t_xifenfei;

PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID STATUS_NEW PACKAGE_NA
------------------- ---------- ----------
               4755          1 呈批处理
               4836          1 公文处理

这里出现异常,怀疑case中传入的值,都走到else那边了,怀疑是在使用dblink 的时候,char的类型发生的改变,转为了number,导致case匹配失败,所以走到else。

4.在dblink端创建视图,插入数据

SQL> CREATE VIEW GZZJ.v_xifenfei
  2  AS
  3  select t.inst_id as ID,
  4         case to_char(w.status)
  5           when '0' then
  6            4
  7           when '2' then
  8            3
  9           else
 10            1
 11         end as  status_new,
 12         p.name as PACKAGE_NAME
 13    from GZZJ.wf_proc_inst i
 14    left join GZZJ.wf_proc_info_inst t on t.inst_id = i.id
 15    left join GZZJ.wf_proc_type p on t.type_id = p.id
 16    left join GZZJ.wf_proc_inst w on t.inst_id = w.id
 17   where t.inst_id = i.id
 18     and t.proc_id <> 53
 19     and t.is_ok = 1
 20     AND t.inst_id <= 4837 
 21     AND t.inst_id>=4735;

View created.

SQL> insert into t_xifenfei 
  2  select * from v_xifenfei@oldmoa;

2 rows created.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL> select * from t_xifenfei;

PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID STATUS_NEW PACKAGE_NA
------------------- ---------- ----------
               4755          3 呈批处理
               4836          3 公文处理

通过远程视图,接触数据类型发生改变异常(怀疑是dblink 在insert时候,char数据类型变成了number,但是未得到官方或者权威的确认)

发表在 Oracle | 一条评论

RBA和实例恢复关系

1.关于heartbeat和checkpoint
在这次的删除过程中我没有执行commit,而是直接abort数据库。整个删除过程执行了近6分钟,控制文件的心跳每三秒进行一次,心跳是把low cache rba记录到了控制文件中,而没有真正的把全部的脏数据写入到磁盘( 只有发生了checkpoint时候,才会把相关的脏数据写入到磁盘,而这里的控制文件的heartbeat和checkpoint是两回事,checkpoint一般是在切换日志,数据文件正常离线,执行begin backup命令时发生,昨晚晚上后面的一个困惑就是上面的英文描述,让我把这两者搞混淆了)

2.三种rba解释
low rba :在buffer cache中的数据块第一次数据改变所对应的RAB。
high rba :在buffer cache中的数据块最近一次数据改变时所对应的RAB。
on-disk rba:是 lgwr 写日志文件的最末位置的地址。

3.实例恢复过程解释
实例恢复的时候,是从控制文件heartbeat记录的low rba开始读redo log数据(会多读取一点,因为heartbeat是每三秒执行一次,假设在2.9秒的时候,数据库异常down了,控制文件中记录的还是2.9秒前的low rba,这个时候,从该点开始读取redo),恢复到on-disk rba,而不是high rba(high rba一般情况下会大于on-disk rba,但是因为high rba比on-disk rba多的部分记录在redo log buffer中,在实例恢复的时候,因为其未被记录到redo log file中,所以不能被恢复,其实也没有必要恢复,因为该数据肯定是没有commit或者rollback)

具体内容和实验请见:RBA和实例恢复关系

发表在 Oracle备份恢复 | 评论关闭

ORA-600 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr故障解决

朋友的数据库服务器出现ORA-00600[kcratr_nab_less_than_odr],不能open数据库
1.open数据库报ORA-00600[kcratr_nab_less_than_odr]

SQL> ALTER DATABASE OPEN;
ALTER DATABASE OPEN
*
第 1 行出现错误:
ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189],
[43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

2.查看alert日志

Wed Jan 11 13:56:16 2012
ALTER DATABASE OPEN
Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads
 parallel recovery started with 2 processes
Started redo scan
Completed redo scan
 read 54591 KB redo, 0 data blocks need recovery
Errors in file d:\dbdms\diag\rdbms\dbdms\dbdms\trace\dbdms_ora_3108.trc  (incident=818557):
ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189], [43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Incident details in: d:\dbdms\diag\rdbms\dbdms\dbdms\incident\incdir_818557\dbdms_ora_3936_i818557.trc
Aborting crash recovery due to error 600
Errors in file d:\dbdms\diag\rdbms\dbdms\dbdms\trace\dbdms_ora_3108.trc:
ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189], [43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Errors in file d:\dbdms\diag\rdbms\dbdms\dbdms\trace\dbdms_ora_3108.trc:
ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189], [43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-600 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE OPEN...
Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20120110214555]

3.查看trace文件

Trace file d:\dbdms\diag\rdbms\dbdms\dbdms\trace\dbdms_ora_3108.trc
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Windows NT Version V6.1 Service Pack 1 
CPU                 : 2 - type 8664, 2 Physical Cores
Process Affinity    : 0x0x0000000000000000
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:2250M/4060M, Ph+PgF:5868M/8119M 
Instance name: dbdms
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 17
Windows thread id: 3108, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)
…………………………
WARNING! Crash recovery of thread 1 seq 99189 is
ending at redo block 43531 but should not have ended before
redo block 43569
Incident 826550 created, dump file: d:\dbdms\diag\rdbms\dbdms\dbdms\incident\incdir_826550\dbdms_ora_3108_i826550.trc
ORA-00600: ??????, ??: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189], [43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

ORA-00600: ??????, ??: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189], [43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-00600: ??????, ??: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189], [43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

通过alert和trace中的内容可以知道,数据库需要恢复到rba到43569,但是因为某种原因实例恢复的时候,只能利用1 thread 99189 seq#,恢复rba到43531。从而导致数据库无法正常open

This Problem is caused by Storage Problem of the Database Files. 
The Subsystem (eg. SAN) crashed while the Database was open. 
The Database then crashed since the Database Files were not accessible anymore. 
This caused a lost Write into the Online RedoLogs and so Instance Recovery is not possible and raising the ORA-600.

4.解决方法

SQL> SELECT STATUS FROM V$INSTANCE;

STATUS
------------
MOUNTED

--尝试直接recover database
SQL> RECOVER DATABASE ;
ORA-00283: 恢复会话因错误而取消
ORA-00264: 不要求恢复
--提示不用恢复

--再打开数据库,还是kcratr_nab_less_than_odr错误警告
SQL> ALTER DATABASE OPEN;
ALTER DATABASE OPEN
*
第 1 行出现错误:
ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [99189],
[43531], [43569], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

--尝试不完全恢复
SQL> RECOVER DATABASE UNTIL CANCEL;
ORA-10879: error signaled in parallel recovery slave
ORA-01547: 警告: RECOVER 成功但 OPEN RESETLOGS 将出现如下错误
ORA-01152: 文件 1 没有从过旧的备份中还原
ORA-01110: 数据文件 1: 'D:\DBDMS\DATA\SYSTEM01.DBF'

--重建控制文件
SQL> ALTER DATABASE BACKUP CONTROLFILE TO TRACE AS 'D:/1.TXT';

数据库已更改。

SQL> SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE;
ORA-01109: 数据库未打开


已经卸载数据库。
ORACLE 例程已经关闭。
SQL> STARTUP NOMOUNT;
ORACLE 例程已经启动。

Total System Global Area  417546240 bytes
Fixed Size                  2176328 bytes
Variable Size             268438200 bytes
Database Buffers          138412032 bytes
Redo Buffers                8519680 bytes
SQL> CREATE CONTROLFILE REUSE DATABASE "DBDMS" NORESETLOGS  NOARCHIVELOG
  2      MAXLOGFILES 16
  3      MAXLOGMEMBERS 3
  4      MAXDATAFILES 100
  5      MAXINSTANCES 8
  6      MAXLOGHISTORY 18688
  7  LOGFILE
  8    GROUP 1 'D:\DBDMS\LOG\REDO01.LOG'  SIZE 50M BLOCKSIZE 512,
  9    GROUP 2 'D:\DBDMS\LOG\REDO02.LOG'  SIZE 50M BLOCKSIZE 512,
 10    GROUP 3 'D:\DBDMS\LOG\REDO03.LOG'  SIZE 50M BLOCKSIZE 512
 11  DATAFILE
 12    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\SYSTEM01.DBF',
 13    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\SYSAUX01.DBF',
 14    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\RBSG01.DBF',
 15    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\DATA01.DBF',
 16    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\INDX01.DBF',
 17    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\DATA02.DBF',
 18    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\DATA03.DBF',
 19    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\DATA04.DBF',
 20    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\INDX02.DBF',
 21    'D:\DBDMS\DATA\SYSTEM02.DBF'
 22  CHARACTER SET ZHS16GBK
 23  ;

控制文件已创建。

--继续尝试恢复
SQL> RECOVER DATABASE ;
完成介质恢复。
SQL> ALTER DATABASE OPEN;

数据库已更改。
--open成功

在这次恢复中,主要就是重建控制文件,然后直接恢复成功,如果redo有损坏,那么可能需要使用不完全恢复,然后使用resetlogs打开数据库

发表在 ORA-xxxxx, Oracle备份恢复 | 标签为 , , | 7 条评论