月归档:五月 2012

ksh翻上/下条和自动补全功能

AIX默认安装ksh,对于习惯了bash的人来说,不能tab自动补全,不能翻上/下,感觉使用起来很不方便,在ksh中不能直接实现这些功能,可以使用另外的方法来完成
一.安装bash程序,使用起来就和bash一样

二.ksh中通过其他方法完成
翻上/下条功能
1、在主目录中 vi .profile
2、添加一行:export EDITOR=vi
3、保存.profile,重新登陆;或者source ~/.profile
现在如果要使用翻上/下条功能,只需要按下esc键,然后使用j/k翻上/下即可;如果要退回到输入功能,直接输入i,然后输入即可.其实所有操作就是和vi中的操作一样.

自动补全功能
使用esc+\

发表在 AIX | 评论关闭

记录一次比较棘手数据库恢复要点

在最近的一次数据库异常恢复过程中遇到不少问题,把重点记录下
ORA-00704/ORA-01555错误

Fri May  4 21:04:21 2012
select ctime, mtime, stime from obj$ where obj# = :1
Fri May  4 21:04:21 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/standdb/udump/perfdb_ora_1286288.trc:
ORA-00704: bootstrap process failure
ORA-00704: bootstrap process failure
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 40 with name "_SYSSMU40$" too small
Error 704 happened during db open, shutting down database
USER: terminating instance due to error 704
Instance terminated by USER, pid = 1286288
ORA-1092 signalled during: alter database open resetlogs...

这里的提示可以看出obj$基表中有事务存在,查询这个表的时候,要去找40号回滚段中相关数据;通过非常规方法,
查找到40号回滚段的状态是offliine了(这个查询出来的信息和是否使用隐含参数无关).

问题原因,为什么40号回滚段变得offline?
Fri May  4 17:36:26 2012
alter tablespace undotbs offline
Fri May  4 17:36:26 2012
ORA-1109 signalled during: alter tablespace undotbs offline...
Fri May  4 17:37:29 2012
alter database datafile  '/dev/rundodbs01' offline drop
Fri May  4 17:37:29 2012
Completed: alter database datafile  '/dev/rundodbs01' offline drop
因为强制offline 了file# 2文件导致(一个undo表空间文件)

解决方法:
1.bbed提交事务
因为现在生产的trace文件中未有关于obj$ 未提交事务的记录,做10046也为发现该记录,如果要使用bbed修改该事务,
那需要dump obj$相关的数据块(在mount状态下dump),然后找到相关事务,再修改

2.强制让file# 2 online
因为在resetlogs前file#2 已经offline掉了,所以要使得该文件能够成功online,需要先推进scn

ORA-00600[krhpfh_03-1209]

SQL> recover database until cancel;
ORA-00283: recovery session canceled due to errors
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1209], [2], [782415504],
[782428968], [3987078030], [2379], [0], [0]
ORA-01110: data file 2: '/dev/rundodbs01'

问题原因:
数据库处于非归档模式下,连续三次resetlogs,引起该bug

解决办法:
重建控制文件

但是这里问题出现了,因为file# 2的resetlogs scn和其他数据文件不一致,导致在file# 2 online的前提下,无法重建.
这样就处在了一个循环中(需要online file# 2 又要重建控制文件),这样的问题,可以通过bbed修改file# 2的resetlogs scn完成
或者先让file# 2 offline(没有加drop)掉,重建控制文件(除掉file# 2的文件记录)

ORA-00600[25025]

SMON: enabling cache recovery
Fri May  4 22:36:36 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/standdb/udump/perfdb_ora_1167402.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [25025], [2], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri May  4 22:36:38 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/standdb/udump/perfdb_ora_1167402.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [25025], [2], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri May  4 22:36:38 2012
Error 600 happened during db open, shutting down database
USER: terminating instance due to error 600
Instance terminated by USER, pid = 1167402

错误原因:
因为有undo文件不在undo对应的表空间中,而我们的file# 2文件确实是undo文件,而且重建控制文件时候未加入进来

解决办法:
  undo_management          = AUTO
  undo_tablespace          = UNDODBS(file# 2属于该表空间)
修改为
  undo_management          = MANUAL
  undo_tablespace          = SYSTEM
或者bbed修改file# 2的header,然后重建控制文件

ORA-00600[4137]

Errors in file /oracle/admin/standdb/bdump/perfdb_smon_1290564.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4137], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri May  4 23:20:52 2012
create undo tablespace undotbs3 datafile '/dev/rundodbs21' size 20400M
Fri May  4 23:23:47 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/standdb/bdump/perfdb_smon_1290564.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4137], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri May  4 23:23:48 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/standdb/bdump/perfdb_pmon_1520126.trc:
ORA-00474: SMON process terminated with error
Fri May  4 23:23:48 2012
PMON: terminating instance due to error 474
Instance terminated by PMON, pid = 1520126

错误原因:
_smon_internal_errlimit(limit of SMON internal errors) SMON遇到了内部错误,最大允许100次,
不断计数增长,达到100的时候,数据库smon进程自动down掉,从而导致数据库down

解决办法:
1.临时解决办法:设置_smon_internal_errlimit一个较大值
3.根本解决办法:使用undo隐含参数,删除有问题undo 回滚段和undo表空间或者使用10513 事件
发表在 Oracle备份恢复 | 标签为 | 评论关闭

Bind Variable Peeking 测试

相关参数

SQL> select * from v$version;

BANNER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

SQL> show parameter optimizer_mode;

NAME                                 TYPE                   VALUE
------------------------------------ ---------------------- ----------------
optimizer_mode                       string                 ALL_ROWS

SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing;

NAME                                 TYPE                   VALUE
------------------------------------ ---------------------- ----------------
cursor_sharing                       string                 EXACT

SQL> select a.ksppinm name,b.ksppstvl value,a.ksppdesc description
  2    from x$ksppi a,x$ksppcv b
  3   where a.inst_id = USERENV ('Instance')
  4     and b.inst_id = USERENV ('Instance')
  5     and a.indx = b.indx
  6     and upper(a.ksppinm) LIKE upper('%&param%')
  7  order by name
  8  /
Enter value for param: _optim_peek_user_binds
old   6:    and upper(a.ksppinm) LIKE upper('%&param%')
new   6:    and upper(a.ksppinm) LIKE upper('%_optim_peek_user_binds%')

NAME                             VALUE                    DESCRIPTION
-------------------------------- ------------------------ ----------------------------------
_optim_peek_user_binds           TRUE                     enable peeking of user binds

创建模拟表

SQL> create table t_xifenfei(id number,name varchar2(30));

Table created.

SQL>  begin
  2     for i in 1..100000 loop
  3          insert into t_xifenfei values(i,'xifenfei');
  4      end loop;
  5      commit;
  6    end;
  7    /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> update t_xifenfei SET name='www.xifenfei.com' where mod(id,20000)=0;

5 row updated.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL> create index i_xifenfei on t_xifenfei(name);

Index created.

默认收集统计信息,查看执行计划

SQL> exec  DBMS_STATS.gather_table_stats(user,'T_XIFENFEI',CASCADE=>TRUE);

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> set autot trace exp 
SQL> select id from t_xifenfei where name='xifenfei';

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 548923532

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 50000 |   683K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 50000 |   683K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("NAME"='xifenfei')

SQL> select id from t_xifenfei where name='www.xifenfei.com';

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 548923532

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 50000 |   683K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 50000 |   683K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("NAME"='www.xifenfei.com')
--这里可以发现,对于这样少量的列的情况,没有选择一个合适的执行计划

准确收集统计信息

SQL> exec  DBMS_STATS.gather_table_stats(user,'T_XIFENFEI',CASCADE=>TRUE,
    2 method_opt => 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE 254',estimate_percent => 100);

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

再次查看执行计划

SQL> select id from t_xifenfei where name='www.xifenfei.com';


Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1926396081

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                   | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |            |     1 |    14 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_XIFENFEI |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   2 - access("NAME"='www.xifenfei.com')


Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          0  recursive calls
          1  db block gets
        320  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        418  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        419  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          5  rows processed

SQL> select id from t_xifenfei where name='xifenfei';

99995 rows selected.


Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 548923532

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 99999 |  1367K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 99999 |  1367K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("NAME"='xifenfei')


Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          0  recursive calls
          1  db block gets
       6970  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
    1455968  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      73745  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       6668  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
      99995  rows processed
--通过这里可以看出在完整的收集表和index包括直方图信息后,数据库执行计划正常
--也说明一点:在数据列分布不均匀的时候,依靠数据库自动收集直方图还是不怎么拷贝.

使用AUTOTRACE测试

SQL> set autot trace exp
SQL> var a varchar2(30);
SQL> exec :a := 'www.xifenfei.com';

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> select id from t_xifenfei where name=:a;

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 548923532

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            | 50000 |   683K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 50000 |   683K|   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("NAME"=:A)
--这里可以发现11g的Bind Variable Peeking 没有使用正确的执行计划,其实这个是AUTOTRACE本身的bug导致

收集下面sql执行计划(peeking测试需要)get_plan.sql脚本

SQL> select * from t_xifenfei where name='wwww.xifenfei.com' and id=100;

no rows selected

SQL> @get_plan.sql

Rollback complete.

Enter value for hash_value: 2708637417
select * from t_xifenfei where name='wwww.xifenfei.com' and id=100

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                   | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |            |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_XIFENFEI |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("ID"=100)
   2 - access("NAME"='wwww.xifenfei.com')
SQL>  select * from t_xifenfei where name='xifenfei' and id=100;

        ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
       100 xifenfei

1 row selected.

SQL> @get_plan.sql

Rollback complete.

Enter value for hash_value: 1355242984
 select * from t_xifenfei where name='xifenfei' and id=100

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            |       |       |   103 (100)|          |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter(("ID"=100 AND "NAME"='xifenfei'))
--这里可以看到,两个执行计划都我们希望的

测试peeking功能

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

System altered.

SQL> select * from t_xifenfei where name='xifenfei' and id=100;

        ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
       100 xifenfei

1 row selected.

SQL> @get_plan.sql

Rollback complete.

Enter value for hash_value: 2860562673
select * from t_xifenfei where name='xifenfei' and id=100

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            |       |       |   103 (100)|          |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter(("ID"=100 AND "NAME"='xifenfei'))
SQL> var b varchar2(30);
SQL> exec :b := 'www.xifenfei.com';

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> select * from t_xifenfei where name=:b and id=100;

no rows selected

SQL> @get_plan.sql

Rollback complete.

Enter value for hash_value: 4157424768
select * from t_xifenfei where name=:b and id=100

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            |       |       |   103 (100)|          |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter(("ID"=100 AND "NAME"=:B))

--重新硬解析
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

System altered.

SQL> var b varchar2(30);
SQL> exec :b := 'www.xifenfei.com';

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> select * from t_xifenfei where name=:b and id=100;

no rows selected

SQL> @get_plan.sql

Rollback complete.

Enter value for hash_value: 4157424768
select * from t_xifenfei where name=:b and id=100

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                   | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |            |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_XIFENFEI |     6 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("ID"=100)
   2 - access("NAME"=:B)
SQL> var b varchar2(30);
SQL> exec :b := 'xifenfei';

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> select * from t_xifenfei where name=:b and id=100;

        ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
       100 xifenfei

1 row selected.

SQL> @get_plan.sql

Rollback complete.

Enter value for hash_value: 4157424768
select * from t_xifenfei where name=:b and id=100

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                   | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |            |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_XIFENFEI |     1 |    14 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_XIFENFEI |     6 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("ID"=100)
   2 - access("NAME"=:B)
--虽然oracle 11g宣称在在Bind Variable Peeking上增强了很多,
--但是这里的实验,依然证明他存在问题,导致执行计划不正确

通过整体实验过程,证明几个问题:
1.默认的的DBMS_STATS收集统计信息不一定使得所有执行计划均正确,特别在数据很不均匀分布时.
2.AUTOTRACE不能跟踪Bind Variable Peeking
3.Bind Variable Peeking是在硬解析时候生效,虽然11g进行了改善,但是有些时候效果还是不明显,如果数据很不均匀,在发现sql语句很多不合适的时候,建议先删除该sql的执行计划,让其再次硬解析,碰碰运气,如果一直效果不好,建议不适用绑定参数形式(正确的执行计划,更多的硬解析)
4._optim_peek_user_binds参数可以关闭Bind Variable Peeking功能,很不推荐.

发表在 Oracle性能优化 | 评论关闭