标签云
asm恢复 bbed bootstrap$ dul In Memory kcbzib_kcrsds_1 kccpb_sanity_check_2 kfed MySQL恢复 ORA-00312 ORA-00607 ORA-00704 ORA-01110 ORA-01555 ORA-01578 ORA-08103 ORA-600 2131 ORA-600 2662 ORA-600 2663 ORA-600 3020 ORA-600 4000 ORA-600 4137 ORA-600 4193 ORA-600 4194 ORA-600 16703 ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1 ORA-600 KCLCHKBLK_4 ORA-15042 ORA-15196 ORACLE 12C oracle dul ORACLE PATCH Oracle Recovery Tools oracle加密恢复 oracle勒索 oracle勒索恢复 oracle异常恢复 Oracle 恢复 ORACLE恢复 ORACLE数据库恢复 oracle 比特币 OSD-04016 YOUR FILES ARE ENCRYPTED 勒索恢复 比特币加密文章分类
- Others (2)
- 中间件 (2)
- WebLogic (2)
- 操作系统 (102)
- 数据库 (1,679)
- DB2 (22)
- MySQL (73)
- Oracle (1,541)
- Data Guard (52)
- EXADATA (8)
- GoldenGate (24)
- ORA-xxxxx (159)
- ORACLE 12C (72)
- ORACLE 18C (6)
- ORACLE 19C (14)
- ORACLE 21C (3)
- Oracle 23ai (7)
- Oracle ASM (67)
- Oracle Bug (8)
- Oracle RAC (52)
- Oracle 安全 (6)
- Oracle 开发 (28)
- Oracle 监听 (28)
- Oracle备份恢复 (563)
- Oracle安装升级 (92)
- Oracle性能优化 (62)
- 专题索引 (5)
- 勒索恢复 (79)
- PostgreSQL (18)
- PostgreSQL恢复 (6)
- SQL Server (27)
- SQL Server恢复 (8)
- TimesTen (7)
- 达梦数据库 (2)
- 生活娱乐 (2)
- 至理名言 (11)
- 虚拟化 (2)
- VMware (2)
- 软件开发 (37)
- Asp.Net (9)
- JavaScript (12)
- PHP (2)
- 小工具 (20)
-
最近发表
- 解决oracle数据文件路径有回车故障
- .wstop扩展名勒索数据库恢复
- Oracle Recovery Tools工具一键解决ORA-00376 ORA-01110故障(文件offline)
- OGG-02771 Input trail file format RELEASE 19.1 is different from previous trail file form at RELEASE 11.2.
- OGG-02246 Source redo compatibility level 19.0.0 requires trail FORMAT 12.2 or higher
- GoldenGate 19安装和打patch
- dd破坏asm磁盘头恢复
- 删除asmlib磁盘导致磁盘组故障恢复
- Kylin Linux 安装19c
- ORA-600 krse_arc_complete.4
- Oracle 19c 202410补丁(RUs+OJVM)
- ntfs MFT损坏(ntfs文件系统故障)导致oracle异常恢复
- .mkp扩展名oracle数据文件加密恢复
- 清空redo,导致ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
- A_H_README_TO_RECOVER勒索恢复
- 通过alert日志分析客户自行对一个数据库恢复的来龙去脉和点评
- ORA-12514: TNS: 监听进程不能解析在连接描述符中给出的SERVICE_NAME
- ORA-01092 ORA-00604 ORA-01558故障处理
- ORA-65088: database open should be retried
- Oracle 19c异常恢复—ORA-01209/ORA-65088
标签归档:bbed修改itl
bbed模拟提交事务一之修改itl
我们都知道,根据oracle 事务的一致性,当我们在session 1中进行dml操作,如果未提交在其他会话中是无法看到修改后的值(只能看到修改前的值).这里通过bbed模拟部分提交事务从而实现在其他会话中查看到另外会话未提交事务(本质已经部分模拟提交,还有undo segment header中信息未清理,下篇补充)
create table(session 1)
SQL> create table chf.t_xifenfei 2 as 3 select object_id,object_name from dba_objects where rownum<20; Table created. SQL> select rowid, 2 dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) rel_fno, 3 dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid) block_no 4 from chf.t_xifenfei; ROWID REL_FNO BLOCK_NO ------------------ ---------- ---------- AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAA 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAB 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAC 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAD 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAE 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAF 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAG 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAH 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAI 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAJ 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAK 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAL 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAM 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAN 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAO 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAP 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAQ 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAR 4 28 AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAS 4 28 19 rows selected. SQL> select * from chf.t_xifenfei; OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME ---------- -------------------- 20 ICOL$ 44 I_USER1 28 CON$ 15 UNDO$ 29 C_COBJ# 3 I_OBJ# 25 PROXY_ROLE_DATA$ 39 I_IND1 51 I_CDEF2 26 I_PROXY_ROLE_DATA$_1 17 FILE$ 13 UET$ 9 I_FILE#_BLOCK# 41 I_FILE1 48 I_CON1 38 I_OBJ3 7 I_TS# 53 I_CDEF4 19 IND$ 19 rows selected.
dump block(session 2)
SQL> alter system checkpoint; System altered. SQL> alter system dump datafile 4 block 28; System altered. Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc 0x01 0xffff.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 C--- 0 scn 0x0b2c.c02d1987 0x02 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000 0x03 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000
update record(session 1)
SQL> update chf.t_xifenfei set object_name ='www.xifenfei.com' where rownum<15; 14 rows updated. SQL> col object_name for a20 SQL> select * from chf.t_xifenfei; OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME ---------- -------------------- 20 www.xifenfei.com 44 www.xifenfei.com 28 www.xifenfei.com 15 www.xifenfei.com 29 www.xifenfei.com 3 www.xifenfei.com 25 www.xifenfei.com 39 www.xifenfei.com 51 www.xifenfei.com 26 www.xifenfei.com 17 www.xifenfei.com 13 www.xifenfei.com 9 www.xifenfei.com 41 www.xifenfei.com 48 I_CON1 38 I_OBJ3 7 I_TS# 53 I_CDEF4 19 IND$ 19 rows selected.
dump block(session 2)
SQL> alter system checkpoint; System altered. --注意flush buffer_cache(不然后面bbed修改会被不能通过select显示,而且会被覆盖) SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache; System altered. SQL> alter system flush shared_pool; System altered. SQL> alter system dump datafile 4 block 28; System altered. Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc 0x01 0xffff.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 C--- 0 scn 0x0b2c.c02d1987 0x02 0x000a.00a.0000017e 0x0081ffc7.01a2.22 ---- 14 fsc 0x0000.00000000 <--注意Lck 14 0x03 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000
bbed commit Transaction(session 3)
BBED> p ktbbh struct ktbbh, 96 bytes @20 ub1 ktbbhtyp @20 0x01 (KDDBTDATA) union ktbbhsid, 4 bytes @24 ub4 ktbbhsg1 @24 0x0000d2f7 ub4 ktbbhod1 @24 0x0000d2f7 struct ktbbhcsc, 8 bytes @28 ub4 kscnbas @28 0xc02d1aec ub2 kscnwrp @32 0x0b2c b2 ktbbhict @36 3 ub1 ktbbhflg @38 0x32 (NONE) ub1 ktbbhfsl @39 0x00 ub4 ktbbhfnx @40 0x01000019 struct ktbbhitl[0], 24 bytes @44 struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @44 ub2 kxidusn @44 0xffff ub2 kxidslt @46 0x0000 ub4 kxidsqn @48 0x00000000 struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @52 ub4 kubadba @52 0x00000000 ub2 kubaseq @56 0x0000 ub1 kubarec @58 0x00 ub2 ktbitflg @60 0x8000 (KTBFCOM) union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @62 b2 _ktbitfsc @62 2860 ub2 _ktbitwrp @62 0x0b2c ub4 ktbitbas @64 0xc02d1987 struct ktbbhitl[1], 24 bytes @68 struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @68 ub2 kxidusn @68 0x000a ub2 kxidslt @70 0x000a ub4 kxidsqn @72 0x0000017e struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @76 ub4 kubadba @76 0x0081ffc7 ub2 kubaseq @80 0x01a2 ub1 kubarec @82 0x22 ub2 ktbitflg @84 0x000e (NONE) <--修改要改为8000 union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @86 b2 _ktbitfsc @86 0 ub2 _ktbitwrp @86 0x0000 ub4 ktbitbas @88 0x00000000 struct ktbbhitl[2], 24 bytes @92 struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @92 ub2 kxidusn @92 0x0000 ub2 kxidslt @94 0x0000 ub4 kxidsqn @96 0x00000000 struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @100 ub4 kubadba @100 0x00000000 ub2 kubaseq @104 0x0000 ub1 kubarec @106 0x00 ub2 ktbitflg @108 0x0000 (NONE) union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @110 b2 _ktbitfsc @110 0 ub2 _ktbitwrp @110 0x0000 ub4 ktbitbas @112 0x00000000 BBED> m /x 0080 offset 84 Warning: contents of previous BIFILE will be lost. Proceed? (Y/N) y File: /u01/oracle/oradata/XFF/users01.dbf (0) Block: 28 Offsets: 84 to 115 Dba:0x00000000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 00800000 00000000 00000000 00000000 <32 bytes per line> BBED> sum apply Check value for File 0, Block 28: current = 0x03dc, required = 0x03dc BBED> p ktbbh struct ktbbh, 96 bytes @20 ………… struct ktbbhitl[1], 24 bytes @68 struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @68 ub2 kxidusn @68 0x000a ub2 kxidslt @70 0x000a ub4 kxidsqn @72 0x0000017e struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @76 ub4 kubadba @76 0x0081ffc7 ub2 kubaseq @80 0x01a2 ub1 kubarec @82 0x22 ub2 ktbitflg @84 0x8000 (KTBFCOM) <--修改值 union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @86 b2 _ktbitfsc @86 0 ub2 _ktbitwrp @86 0x0000 ub4 ktbitbas @88 0x00000000 …………
dump block(session 2)
SQL> alter system dump datafile 4 block 28; System altered. Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc 0x01 0xffff.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 C--- 0 scn 0x0b2c.c02d1987 0x02 0x000a.00a.0000017e 0x0081ffc7.01a2.22 C--- 0 scn 0x0000.00000000 0x03 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000
select data(session 4)
SQL> select object_id,object_name from chf.t_xifenfei; OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME ---------- -------------------- 20 www.xifenfei.com 44 www.xifenfei.com 28 www.xifenfei.com 15 www.xifenfei.com 29 www.xifenfei.com 3 www.xifenfei.com 25 www.xifenfei.com 39 www.xifenfei.com 51 www.xifenfei.com 26 www.xifenfei.com 17 www.xifenfei.com 13 www.xifenfei.com 9 www.xifenfei.com 41 www.xifenfei.com 48 I_CON1 38 I_OBJ3 7 I_TS# 53 I_CDEF4 19 IND$ 19 rows selected.
这里可以看到,已经模拟出来在其他session中可以访问数据库为commit的记录(在该block级别已经模拟了commit)