标签云
asm恢复 bbed bootstrap$ dul kcbzib_kcrsds_1 kccpb_sanity_check_2 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr MySQL恢复 ORA-00312 ORA-00704 ORA-00742 ORA-01110 ORA-01200 ORA-01555 ORA-01578 ORA-01595 ORA-600 2662 ORA-600 3020 ORA-600 4000 ORA-600 4137 ORA-600 4193 ORA-600 4194 ORA-600 16703 ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1 ORA-600 KCLCHKBLK_4 ORA-600 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr ORA-600 kdsgrp1 ORA-15042 ORA-15196 ORACLE 12C oracle dul ORACLE PATCH Oracle Recovery Tools oracle加密恢复 oracle勒索 oracle勒索恢复 oracle异常恢复 ORACLE恢复 Oracle 恢复 ORACLE数据库恢复 oracle 比特币 OSD-04016 YOUR FILES ARE ENCRYPTED 勒索恢复 比特币加密文章分类
- Others (2)
- 中间件 (2)
- WebLogic (2)
- 操作系统 (110)
- 数据库 (1,828)
- DB2 (22)
- MySQL (80)
- Oracle (1,657)
- Data Guard (53)
- EXADATA (8)
- GoldenGate (24)
- ORA-xxxxx (168)
- ORACLE 12C (72)
- ORACLE 18C (6)
- ORACLE 19C (15)
- ORACLE 21C (3)
- Oracle 23ai (8)
- Oracle ASM (69)
- Oracle Bug (8)
- Oracle RAC (54)
- Oracle 安全 (6)
- Oracle 开发 (28)
- Oracle 监听 (29)
- Oracle备份恢复 (625)
- Oracle安装升级 (103)
- Oracle性能优化 (62)
- 专题索引 (5)
- 勒索恢复 (86)
- PostgreSQL (37)
- pdu工具 (7)
- PostgreSQL恢复 (13)
- SQL Server (34)
- SQL Server恢复 (14)
- TimesTen (7)
- 达梦数据库 (3)
- 达梦恢复 (1)
- 生活娱乐 (2)
- 至理名言 (11)
- 虚拟化 (2)
- VMware (2)
- 软件开发 (46)
- Asp.Net (9)
- JavaScript (12)
- PHP (2)
- 小工具 (29)
-
最近发表
- obet处理ORA-704 ORA-604 ORA-1578故障
- obet修复csc higher than block scn类型坏块
- ORA-600 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr和ORA-600 4193故障处理
- aix环境10g由于控制器异常导致ORA-600 4000故障处理
- ORA-600 3716故障处理
- 不当恢复truncate数据导致数据库不能open处理
- 注意:PostgreSQL库出现readme_to_recover勒索
- Oracle 19c 202601补丁(RUs+OJVM)-19.30
- Patch_SCN快速解决ORA-600 2663故障
- 在生产环境错误执行dd命令破坏asm磁盘故障恢复
- obet实现对数据文件坏块检测功能
- oracle linux 8.10注意pmlogger导致空间被大量占用
- obet快速修改scn/resetlogs恢复数据库(缺少归档,ORA-00308)
- 使用DBMS_PDB.RECOVER抢救单个pdb
- aix环境写入大文件设置combehin提高效率
- 记录一次国产数据库被rm -rf /*删除的救援过程
- 数据库启动报 maximum number of processes () exceeded分析
- ORA-600 [ksunfy : too few sessions]
- 由于数据块scn大于数据库scn导致ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1错误
- ORA-600 ktbair2: illegal inheritance恢复
标签归档:bbed修改itl
bbed模拟提交事务一之修改itl
我们都知道,根据oracle 事务的一致性,当我们在session 1中进行dml操作,如果未提交在其他会话中是无法看到修改后的值(只能看到修改前的值).这里通过bbed模拟部分提交事务从而实现在其他会话中查看到另外会话未提交事务(本质已经部分模拟提交,还有undo segment header中信息未清理,下篇补充)
create table(session 1)
SQL> create table chf.t_xifenfei
2 as
3 select object_id,object_name from dba_objects where rownum<20;
Table created.
SQL> select rowid,
2 dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) rel_fno,
3 dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid) block_no
4 from chf.t_xifenfei;
ROWID REL_FNO BLOCK_NO
------------------ ---------- ----------
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAA 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAB 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAC 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAD 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAE 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAF 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAG 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAH 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAI 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAJ 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAK 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAL 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAM 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAN 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAO 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAP 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAQ 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAR 4 28
AAANL3AAEAAAAAcAAS 4 28
19 rows selected.
SQL> select * from chf.t_xifenfei;
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
---------- --------------------
20 ICOL$
44 I_USER1
28 CON$
15 UNDO$
29 C_COBJ#
3 I_OBJ#
25 PROXY_ROLE_DATA$
39 I_IND1
51 I_CDEF2
26 I_PROXY_ROLE_DATA$_1
17 FILE$
13 UET$
9 I_FILE#_BLOCK#
41 I_FILE1
48 I_CON1
38 I_OBJ3
7 I_TS#
53 I_CDEF4
19 IND$
19 rows selected.
dump block(session 2)
SQL> alter system checkpoint; System altered. SQL> alter system dump datafile 4 block 28; System altered. Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc 0x01 0xffff.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 C--- 0 scn 0x0b2c.c02d1987 0x02 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000 0x03 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000
update record(session 1)
SQL> update chf.t_xifenfei set object_name ='www.xifenfei.com' where rownum<15;
14 rows updated.
SQL> col object_name for a20
SQL> select * from chf.t_xifenfei;
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
---------- --------------------
20 www.xifenfei.com
44 www.xifenfei.com
28 www.xifenfei.com
15 www.xifenfei.com
29 www.xifenfei.com
3 www.xifenfei.com
25 www.xifenfei.com
39 www.xifenfei.com
51 www.xifenfei.com
26 www.xifenfei.com
17 www.xifenfei.com
13 www.xifenfei.com
9 www.xifenfei.com
41 www.xifenfei.com
48 I_CON1
38 I_OBJ3
7 I_TS#
53 I_CDEF4
19 IND$
19 rows selected.
dump block(session 2)
SQL> alter system checkpoint; System altered. --注意flush buffer_cache(不然后面bbed修改会被不能通过select显示,而且会被覆盖) SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache; System altered. SQL> alter system flush shared_pool; System altered. SQL> alter system dump datafile 4 block 28; System altered. Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc 0x01 0xffff.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 C--- 0 scn 0x0b2c.c02d1987 0x02 0x000a.00a.0000017e 0x0081ffc7.01a2.22 ---- 14 fsc 0x0000.00000000 <--注意Lck 14 0x03 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000
bbed commit Transaction(session 3)
BBED> p ktbbh
struct ktbbh, 96 bytes @20
ub1 ktbbhtyp @20 0x01 (KDDBTDATA)
union ktbbhsid, 4 bytes @24
ub4 ktbbhsg1 @24 0x0000d2f7
ub4 ktbbhod1 @24 0x0000d2f7
struct ktbbhcsc, 8 bytes @28
ub4 kscnbas @28 0xc02d1aec
ub2 kscnwrp @32 0x0b2c
b2 ktbbhict @36 3
ub1 ktbbhflg @38 0x32 (NONE)
ub1 ktbbhfsl @39 0x00
ub4 ktbbhfnx @40 0x01000019
struct ktbbhitl[0], 24 bytes @44
struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @44
ub2 kxidusn @44 0xffff
ub2 kxidslt @46 0x0000
ub4 kxidsqn @48 0x00000000
struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @52
ub4 kubadba @52 0x00000000
ub2 kubaseq @56 0x0000
ub1 kubarec @58 0x00
ub2 ktbitflg @60 0x8000 (KTBFCOM)
union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @62
b2 _ktbitfsc @62 2860
ub2 _ktbitwrp @62 0x0b2c
ub4 ktbitbas @64 0xc02d1987
struct ktbbhitl[1], 24 bytes @68
struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @68
ub2 kxidusn @68 0x000a
ub2 kxidslt @70 0x000a
ub4 kxidsqn @72 0x0000017e
struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @76
ub4 kubadba @76 0x0081ffc7
ub2 kubaseq @80 0x01a2
ub1 kubarec @82 0x22
ub2 ktbitflg @84 0x000e (NONE) <--修改要改为8000
union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @86
b2 _ktbitfsc @86 0
ub2 _ktbitwrp @86 0x0000
ub4 ktbitbas @88 0x00000000
struct ktbbhitl[2], 24 bytes @92
struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @92
ub2 kxidusn @92 0x0000
ub2 kxidslt @94 0x0000
ub4 kxidsqn @96 0x00000000
struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @100
ub4 kubadba @100 0x00000000
ub2 kubaseq @104 0x0000
ub1 kubarec @106 0x00
ub2 ktbitflg @108 0x0000 (NONE)
union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @110
b2 _ktbitfsc @110 0
ub2 _ktbitwrp @110 0x0000
ub4 ktbitbas @112 0x00000000
BBED> m /x 0080 offset 84
Warning: contents of previous BIFILE will be lost. Proceed? (Y/N) y
File: /u01/oracle/oradata/XFF/users01.dbf (0)
Block: 28 Offsets: 84 to 115 Dba:0x00000000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
00800000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<32 bytes per line>
BBED> sum apply
Check value for File 0, Block 28:
current = 0x03dc, required = 0x03dc
BBED> p ktbbh
struct ktbbh, 96 bytes @20
…………
struct ktbbhitl[1], 24 bytes @68
struct ktbitxid, 8 bytes @68
ub2 kxidusn @68 0x000a
ub2 kxidslt @70 0x000a
ub4 kxidsqn @72 0x0000017e
struct ktbituba, 8 bytes @76
ub4 kubadba @76 0x0081ffc7
ub2 kubaseq @80 0x01a2
ub1 kubarec @82 0x22
ub2 ktbitflg @84 0x8000 (KTBFCOM) <--修改值
union _ktbitun, 2 bytes @86
b2 _ktbitfsc @86 0
ub2 _ktbitwrp @86 0x0000
ub4 ktbitbas @88 0x00000000
…………
dump block(session 2)
SQL> alter system dump datafile 4 block 28; System altered. Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc 0x01 0xffff.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 C--- 0 scn 0x0b2c.c02d1987 0x02 0x000a.00a.0000017e 0x0081ffc7.01a2.22 C--- 0 scn 0x0000.00000000 0x03 0x0000.000.00000000 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0 fsc 0x0000.00000000
select data(session 4)
SQL> select object_id,object_name from chf.t_xifenfei;
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
---------- --------------------
20 www.xifenfei.com
44 www.xifenfei.com
28 www.xifenfei.com
15 www.xifenfei.com
29 www.xifenfei.com
3 www.xifenfei.com
25 www.xifenfei.com
39 www.xifenfei.com
51 www.xifenfei.com
26 www.xifenfei.com
17 www.xifenfei.com
13 www.xifenfei.com
9 www.xifenfei.com
41 www.xifenfei.com
48 I_CON1
38 I_OBJ3
7 I_TS#
53 I_CDEF4
19 IND$
19 rows selected.
这里可以看到,已经模拟出来在其他session中可以访问数据库为commit的记录(在该block级别已经模拟了commit)

加我微信(17813235971)
加我QQ(107644445)

