kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process, error 1089

闲着无聊,看历史的alert文件,发现kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process, error 1089警告

Thu Jul  8 21:23:39 2010
Starting background process CJQ0
CJQ0 started with pid=18, OS id=9019
Thu Jul  8 21:23:39 2010
Shutting down instance: further logons disabled
Thu Jul  8 21:23:42 2010
kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process, error 1089
………………
Thu Jul  8 21:23:57 2010
kkjcre1p: unable to spawn jobq slave process, error 1089
Thu Jul  8 21:23:59 2010
Stopping background process QMNC
Thu Jul  8 21:23:59 2010
Stopping background process CJQ0
Thu Jul  8 21:24:01 2010
Stopping background process MMNL
Thu Jul  8 21:24:02 2010
Stopping background process MMON
Thu Jul  8 21:24:03 2010
Shutting down instance (immediate)
License high water mark = 1
Waiting for dispatcher 'D000' to shutdown
All dispatchers and shared servers shutdown
Thu Jul  8 21:24:05 2010
ALTER DATABASE CLOSE NORMAL
Thu Jul  8 21:24:05 2010
SMON: disabling tx recovery
SMON: disabling cache recovery
Thu Jul  8 21:24:05 2010
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
Archive process shutdown avoided: 0 active
Thread 1 closed at log sequence 2
Successful close of redo thread 1
Thu Jul  8 21:24:05 2010
Completed: ALTER DATABASE CLOSE NORMAL
Thu Jul  8 21:24:05 2010
ALTER DATABASE DISMOUNT
Completed: ALTER DATABASE DISMOUNT
ARCH: Archival disabled due to shutdown: 1089
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
Archive process shutdown avoided: 0 active
ARCH: Archival disabled due to shutdown: 1089
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
Archive process shutdown avoided: 0 active

警告原因
If a job is about to be spawned when shutdown of database is in progress, you will see these errors in the alert log file and this is perfectly valid.

解决方法
1、这个警告可以安全的忽略
There is no harm at all because of this warning being logged to the alert.log The Error can be safely ignored as the job coordinator process tried to spawn a job slave when the Shutdown was in progress.

2、设置_JOB_QUEUE_INTERVAL更大值,减少出现该警告概率
One workaround that we can suggest is to set an underscore parameter
_JOB_QUEUE_INTERVAL=120 or greater value
The default value is 60 but when we change to 120 there are less chances of getting the above warnings in the alert log file.
Kkjcre1p: Unable To Spawn Jobq Slave Process, Error 1089 [ID 344275.1]

发表在 Oracle | 评论关闭

ORA-00600[4194]故障解决

朋友数据库因为断电,导致数据库正常启动片刻之后,自动down掉
一、alert日志

Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
Picked latch-free SCN scheme 2
Autotune of undo retention is turned on. 
IMODE=BR
ILAT =18
LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
SYS auditing is disabled
ksdpec: called for event 13740 prior to event group initialization
Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.1.0.
System parameters with non-default values:
  processes                = 150
  __shared_pool_size       = 58720256
  __large_pool_size        = 4194304
  __java_pool_size         = 4194304
  __streams_pool_size      = 4194304
  nls_date_format          = yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
  sga_target               = 335544320
  control_files            = /u02/ezhou/control01.ctl
  db_block_size            = 8192
  compatible               = 10.2.0.1.0
  log_archive_dest         = /u02/arch
  log_archive_max_processes= 10
  db_file_multiblock_read_count= 16
  fast_start_mttr_target   = 300
  undo_management          = AUTO
  undo_tablespace          = UNDOTBS1
  remote_login_passwordfile= EXCLUSIVE
  db_domain                = 
  dispatchers              = (PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=ezhouXDB)
  job_queue_processes      = 10
  background_dump_dest     = /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump
  user_dump_dest           = /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/udump
  core_dump_dest           = /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/cdump
  audit_file_dest          = /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/adump
  db_name                  = ezhou
  open_cursors             = 400
  sql_trace                = TRUE
  pga_aggregate_target     = 94371840
MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=5539
PMON started with pid=2, OS id=5535
DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=5541
LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=5543
SMON started with pid=8, OS id=5547
CJQ0 started with pid=10, OS id=5577
RECO started with pid=9, OS id=5575
Sat Dec 10 17:15:40 2011
starting up 1 dispatcher(s) for network address '(ADDRESS=(PARTIAL=YES)(PROTOCOL=TCP))'
MMNL started with pid=12, OS id=5581
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=5579
Sat Dec 10 17:15:40 2011
starting up 1 shared server(s) ...
PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=5537
CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=5545
Sat Dec 10 17:15:42 2011
ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
Sat Dec 10 17:15:46 2011
Setting recovery target incarnation to 3
Sat Dec 10 17:15:47 2011
Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 4055654398
Sat Dec 10 17:15:47 2011
Database mounted in Exclusive Mode
Completed: ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
Sat Dec 10 17:15:47 2011
ALTER DATABASE OPEN
Sat Dec 10 17:15:47 2011
Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads
Sat Dec 10 17:15:47 2011
Started redo scan
Sat Dec 10 17:15:48 2011
Completed redo scan
 319 redo blocks read, 98 data blocks need recovery
Sat Dec 10 17:15:50 2011
Started redo application at
 Thread 1: logseq 24, block 3
Sat Dec 10 17:15:50 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 3 Seq 24 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo03.log
Sat Dec 10 17:15:50 2011
Completed redo application
Sat Dec 10 17:15:51 2011
Completed crash recovery at
 Thread 1: logseq 24, block 322, scn 6168722
 98 data blocks read, 98 data blocks written, 319 redo blocks read
Sat Dec 10 17:15:51 2011
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES
ARC1 started with pid=17, OS id=5645
ARC0 started with pid=16, OS id=5643
ARC3 started with pid=19, OS id=5649
ARC4 started with pid=20, OS id=5651
ARC2 started with pid=18, OS id=5647
ARC6 started with pid=22, OS id=5655
ARC7 started with pid=23, OS id=5657
ARC5 started with pid=21, OS id=5653
ARC8 started with pid=24, OS id=5659
Sat Dec 10 17:15:52 2011
ARC0: Archival started
ARC1: Archival started
ARC2: Archival started
ARC3: Archival started
ARC4: Archival started
ARC5: Archival started
ARC6: Archival started
ARC7: Archival started
ARC8: Archival started
ARC9: Archival started
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES COMPLETE
ARC9 started with pid=25, OS id=5661
Sat Dec 10 17:15:52 2011
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 25
Sat Dec 10 17:15:53 2011
ARC2: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES
Sat Dec 10 17:15:53 2011
ARC6: Becoming the 'no FAL' ARCH
ARC6: Becoming the 'no SRL' ARCH
Sat Dec 10 17:15:53 2011
ARC3: Becoming the heartbeat ARCH
Sat Dec 10 17:15:53 2011
Thread 1 opened at log sequence 25
  Current log# 1 seq# 25 mem# 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Current log# 1 seq# 25 mem# 1: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Successful open of redo thread 1
Sat Dec 10 17:15:53 2011
SMON: enabling cache recovery
Sat Dec 10 17:15:54 2011
ARCa: Archival started
ARC2: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES COMPLETE
ARCa started with pid=26, OS id=5663
Sat Dec 10 17:15:57 2011
Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 1.
Sat Dec 10 17:15:57 2011
SMON: enabling tx recovery
Sat Dec 10 17:15:57 2011
Database Characterset is AL32UTF8
replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)
Starting background process QMNC
QMNC started with pid=27, OS id=5666
Sat Dec 10 17:16:13 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_smon_5547.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:16:17 2011
Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN
Sat Dec 10 17:16:27 2011
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 4124
Block recovery from logseq 25, block 68 to scn 6168829
Sat Dec 10 17:16:27 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 25 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Mem# 1 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Block recovery stopped at EOT rba 25.126.16
Block recovery completed at rba 25.126.16, scn 0.6168829
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 73
Block recovery from logseq 25, block 68 to scn 6168786
Sat Dec 10 17:16:28 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 25 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Mem# 1 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Block recovery completed at rba 25.69.16, scn 0.6168789
Sat Dec 10 17:16:28 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_smon_5547.trc:
ORA-01595: error freeing extent (2) of rollback segment (5))
ORA-00607: Internal error occurred while making a change to a data block
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:16:30 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_j002_5690.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:16:37 2011
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 4124
Block recovery from logseq 25, block 68 to scn 6168829
Sat Dec 10 17:16:37 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 25 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Mem# 1 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Block recovery completed at rba 25.126.16, scn 0.6168830
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 73
Block recovery from logseq 25, block 68 to scn 6168841
Sat Dec 10 17:16:37 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 25 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Mem# 1 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Block recovery completed at rba 25.149.16, scn 0.6168843
Sat Dec 10 17:16:37 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_j002_5690.trc:
ORA-12012: error on auto execute of job 8886
ORA-00607: Internal error occurred while making a change to a data block
Sat Dec 10 17:16:41 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_j003_5692.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:16:42 2011
DEBUG: Replaying xcb 0x32a2b17c, pmd 0x32bdbd24 for failed op 8
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 4124
Block recovery from logseq 25, block 68 to scn 6168829
Sat Dec 10 17:16:42 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 25 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Mem# 1 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Block recovery completed at rba 25.126.16, scn 0.6168830
Sat Dec 10 17:16:43 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_j003_5692.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:16:46 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_j003_5692.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:17:46 2011
DEBUG: Replaying xcb 0x32a2b17c, pmd 0x32bdbd24 for failed op 8
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 4124
Block recovery from logseq 25, block 68 to scn 6168829
Sat Dec 10 17:17:46 2011
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 25 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01.log
  Mem# 1 errs 0: /u02/ezhou/redo01a.rdo
Block recovery completed at rba 25.126.16, scn 0.6168830
Sat Dec 10 17:17:48 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_pmon_5535.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
Sat Dec 10 17:17:49 2011
Errors in file /u01/pp/oracle/admin/ezhou/bdump/ezhou_pmon_5535.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [30], [27], [], [], [], [], []
PMON: terminating instance due to error 472
Instance terminated by PMON, pid = 5535

二、MOS记录

ERROR:              
  ORA-600 [4194] [a] [b]
 
VERSIONS:           
  versions 6.0 to 10.1 

DESCRIPTION:

  A mismatch has been detected between Redo records and rollback (Undo) 
  records.

  We are validating the Undo record number relating to the change being 
  applied against the maximum undo record number recorded in the undo block.

  This error is reported when the validation fails.

ARGUMENTS:
  Arg [a] Maximum Undo record number in Undo block
  Arg [b] Undo record number from Redo block

三、解决办法
1、修改参数
undo_management= MANUAL
undo_tablespace= SYSTEM
2、打开数据库,删除当前undo空间,重建新undo空间
3、修改参数
undo_management= AUTO
undo_tablespace= UNDOTBSNEW
4、重新启动数据库

发表在 ORA-xxxxx, Oracle备份恢复 | 标签为 , | 评论关闭

in/exists和not in/not exists语意探讨

本篇只讨论in/exists和not in/not exists语意,不涉及这些写法的执行效率问题,至于效率问题请见:in/exists和not in/not exists执行效率
1、准备实验环境

C:\Users\XIFENFEI>sqlplus chf_xff/xifenfei

SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on 星期六 12月 10 14:55:14 2011

Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle.  All rights reserved.


连接到:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Oracle Label Security, OLAP, Data Mining,
Oracle Database Vault and Real Application Testing options

SQL> create table t1 (c1 number,c2 number);

表已创建。

SQL> create table t2 (c1 number,c2 number);

表已创建。

SQL> insert into t1 values (1,2);

已创建 1 行。

SQL> insert into t1 values (1,3);

已创建 1 行。

SQL> insert into t2 values (1,2);

已创建 1 行。

SQL> insert into t2 values (1,null);

已创建 1 行。

SQL> insert into t1 values (1,null);

已创建 1 行。

SQL> commit;

提交完成。

SQL> select * from t1;

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          2
         1          3
         1

SQL> select * from t2;

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          2
         1

Note:t1和t2表都有null,且t1比t2多一条记录

2、t2做内部表

SQL> select * from t1 where c2 in (select c2 from t2 );

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          2

SQL> select * from t1 where exists (select c2 from t2 where t1.c2=t2.c2);

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          2

SQL> select * from t1 where c2 not in (select c2 from t2 );

未选定行

SQL> select * from t1 where not exists (select 1 from t2 where t1.c2=t2.c2);

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          3
         1

3、t1为内部表

SQL> select * from t2 where c2 in (select c2 from t1 );

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          2

SQL> select * from t2 where exists (select c2 from t1 where t1.c2=t2.c2);

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1          2

SQL> select * from t2 where c2 not in (select c2 from t1 );

未选定行

SQL> select * from t2 where not exists (select 1 from t1 where t1.c2=t2.c2);

        C1         C2
---------- ----------
         1

3、结论
in和exists结果相同(都会排除掉null,无论内部表中有无null)
not in会过滤掉外部表中的null(即使内部表中无null)
not exists不会过滤掉外部表的null(即使内部表有null)
由于篇幅关系,括号中的部分实验过程未展现出来

发表在 Oracle 开发 | 评论关闭