DBCA Fails With ORA-15243

今天接到朋友的电话说他们装ORACLE 11G R1 RAC的时候遇到ORA-12801/ORA-15243错误,请求我帮忙解决
具体情况
AIX系统以前装过11G R2 RAC,现因为项目要求11G R1,已经重装了系统,然后安装R1,在安装到DBCA配置ASM的时候,出现ORA-12801/ORA-15243错误

ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server PZ99, instance wmsdb1:+ASM1(1)
ORA-15243: 11.2.0.0.0 is not a valid version number


通过SQLPLUS登录ASM1实例查询发现该有一个ORADATA磁盘组,包含了一个/dev/rhdisk1.通过询问,得出结论是这个磁盘组以前是安装R2的时候作为存储OCR和VOTINGDISK使用,重装系统的时候未对该磁盘进行处理.

处理思路[想办法清除磁盘中asm信息]
1.尝试通过sqlplus 删除该磁盘组,报该磁盘组处于dismount状态
2.尝试mount该磁盘组,提示版本无效(ORA-15243)[当前的asm程序是11.1而磁盘组信息是11.2 程序当然不一致了]
3.直接使用dd清理该asm disk header信息(dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rhdisk1 bs=4096 count=1)
4.重新运行dbca一切工作正常

MOS中相关文章[1460997.1]只适合linux asmlib情况

Applies to:
Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version 11.1.0.7 and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.

Symptoms
On : 11.1.0.7 version, STORAGE

When attempting to create database or query gv$asm_diskgroup,
the following error occurs.

ERROR
-----------------------
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server PZ99, instance dchilcmsdb2.hq.navteq.com:+ASM2 (2)
ORA-15243: 11.2.0.0.0 is not a valid version number


STEPS
-----------------------
The issue can be reproduced at will with the following steps:
1. Previously had 11GR2 installed and configured. Removed this installation then installed 
   11.1.0.7  and created diskgroups using some of the same disks previously used.
2. Attempt to create database and receive the errors. Drop the newly 
   created diskgroups and query the view still get same errors.


BUSINESS IMPACT
-----------------------
The issue has the following business impact:
Due to this issue, users cannot create new database.

Changes
 Removed 11.2.0.1 installation and installed 11.1.0.7 software without cleaning up all of 
 the diskgroup information from previous installation.

Cause
All the current information shows that we are using correct binaries and 
that the diskgroups that are being used have correct comparability settings. 
HTML shows that the disks for the old diskgroup are still being discovered. 
This in conjunction with the text of the error as follows shows that 
we are picking up 11.2.0.0.0 as version from somewhere.
ORA-15243: 11.2.0.0.0 is not a valid version number
 
Problem was caused by the disks that had been used for the 
OCR/Voting disk diskgroup in 11GR2 installation still being present and accessible.
 

Solution
As the root user execute /etc/init.d/oracleasm/deletedisk command against all the disks 
that were previously used for the OCR/Voting disk diskgroup then try the operation again.
发表在 ORA-xxxxx | 标签为 | 评论关闭

11g DirectPath Reads 噩梦案例

DirectPath Reads 说明
在oracle 11g以前的版本中,如果对大表进行全表扫描,wait event是:db file scattered read;在11g中,如果对大表进行全表扫描,wait event是:direct path read。在11g中,大表全表扫描时数据块不经过sga而直接进pga,这样会造成每次进行大表全表扫描,物理读都是很大,而在10g中,由于全表扫描的数据块在sga中已经存在,所以执行全表扫描时,它的物理读为0。但是这里主要是oracle在优化策略上的进步,即假定大表频繁全表扫描这种现象,在生产库上不会太多,通过把数据直接读入pga,进而减少了cache buffer的繁忙交换程度,提高了cache buffer的使用效率.

DirectPath Reads 优势
1. 减少了对栓的使用,避免可能的栓争用
2. 物理IO的大小不再取决于buffer_cache中所存在的块;试想某个8个块的extent中1,3,5,7号块在高速缓存中,而2,4,6,8块没有被缓存,传统的方式在读取该extent时将会是对2,4,6,8块进行4次db file sequential read,这是一种十分可怕的状况,其效率往往要比单次读取这个区间的所有8个块还要低得多,虽然Oracle为了避免这种情况总是尽可能的不缓存大表的块(读入后总是放在队列最冷的一端);而direct path read则可以完全避免这类问题,尽可能地单次读入更多的物理块。

DirectPath Reads 噩梦
这一切听起来都很美好,但是在大并发的OLTP系统中,这东西简直是一个噩梦.通过一个awr来说明该问题:这个是一个系统的awr报告,朋友反馈说系统有段运行缓慢,请求帮忙找出原因
分析总体信息

系统这段时间会话临时大幅度增加(从102增加到223),系统出现异常繁忙(60.62*16=969.92<2,454.52)
分析Load Profile信息

通过这个截图发现系统的业务不是很大,但是Physical reads参数异常
1.物理读大小:25071.1*8192/1024/1024=195.86796875M/S
2.物理读将近逻辑读一半,这个在一般系统中很难得到这个比例,进一步说明物理读过高

分析Top 5信息

这里可以发现direct path read等待很多

分析Host CPU

可以发现iowait很大占40.5%,io等待异常高(195M/S能不高吗?)
补充说明:在这里我们看到的%Idle=1-%System-%User不包括%WIO

处理建议
通过上面的评估,可以确定大部分是由于 导致了数据库的物理读过高,从而使得系统反应变慢,处理方法就是关闭掉11g该新特性
alter system set event= ’10949 trace name context forever, level 1′ scope=spfile;
重启数据库

发表在 Oracle性能优化 | 评论关闭

undo segment header坏块异常恢复

alert日志报ORA-00600[4137]与ORA-00600 [4198]错误
数据库报如下错误,运行一段时间数据库自动down掉

Fri Jul  6 18:00:40 2012
SMON: ignoring slave err,downgrading to serial rollback
Fri Jul  6 18:00:41 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_smon_16636.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4137], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORACLE Instance techdb (pid = 8) - Error 600 encountered while recovering transaction (3, 17).
Fri Jul  6 18:00:41 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_smon_16636.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4137], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Jul  6 18:05:53 2012
SMON: Restarting fast_start parallel rollback
Fri Jul  6 18:05:54 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_p000_17124.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4198], [9], [], [], [], [], [], []
…………
Wed Jul  6 18:50:38 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_pmon_4473.trc:
ORA-00474: SMON process terminated with error
Wed Jul  6 18:50:38 2012
PMON: terminating instance due to error 474

从三个地方得出3号回滚段异常
1.trace文件

SMON: about to recover undo segment 3
Parallel Transaction recovery caught exception 12801
Parallel Transaction recovery caught error 30317 
*** 2012-07-06 17:55:19.042
SMON: Restarting fast_start parallel rollback
SMON: about to recover undo segment 3
SMON: mark undo segment 3 as available
SMON: about to recover undo segment 3
SMON: mark undo segment 3 as available
Parallel Transaction recovery caught exception 12801
Parallel Transaction recovery caught error 607 
*** 2012-07-06 17:55:19.761
SMON: ignoring slave err,downgrading to serial rollback
SMON: about to recover undo segment 3
XID passed in =xid: 0x0003.011.00003c2b
XID from Undo block =xid: 0x0004.020.00002b35

2.alert中提示while recovering transaction (3, 17)
3.查询dba_rollback_segs发现_SYSSMU3$是NEED RECOVERY状态

尝试删除_SYSSMU3$
使用隐含参数_offline_rollback_segments= _SYSSMU3$

Fri Jul  6 18:16:19 2012
Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN
Fri Jul  6 18:16:56 2012
drop rollback segment "_SYSSMU3$"
Fri Jul  6 18:16:57 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/udump/techdb_ora_17381.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kddummy_blkchk], [2], [41], [38508], [], [], [], []
Fri Jul  6 18:16:57 2012
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 41
Block recovery from logseq 209591, block 183 to scn 7788878085
Fri Jul  6 18:16:57 2012
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 209591 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0 errs 0: /usr/local/oracle/oradata/techdb/redo01.log
Block recovery completed at rba 209591.225.16, scn 1.3493910790
ORA-607 signalled during: drop rollback segment "_SYSSMU3$"...
Fri Jul  6 18:16:57 2012
Corrupt Block Found
         TSN = 1, TSNAME = UNDOTBS1
         RFN = 2, BLK = 41, RDBA = 8388649
         OBJN = 0, OBJD = -1, OBJECT = _NEXT_OBJECT, SUBOBJECT = 
         SEGMENT OWNER = SYS, SEGMENT TYPE = Invalid Type
Fri Jul  6 18:16:57 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_smon_17367.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kddummy_blkchk], [2], [41], [38508], [], [], [], []
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 41
Block recovery from logseq 209591, block 183 to scn 7788878085
Fri Jul  6 18:17:46 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_pmon_17355.trc:
ORA-00474: SMON process terminated with error
Fri Jul  6 18:17:46 2012
PMON: terminating instance due to error 474
Fri Jul  6 18:17:46 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_dbw0_17361.trc:
ORA-00474: SMON process terminated with error
Fri Jul  6 18:17:46 2012
Errors in file /usr/local/oracle/admin/techdb/bdump/techdb_lgwr_17363.trc:
ORA-00474: SMON process terminated with error
Instance terminated by PMON, pid = 17355

这里可以看出在使用隐含参数删除异常回滚段的时候,因为该回滚段有坏块出现ORA-00600[kddummy_blkchk]使得数据库donw掉,重启过几次该库都因为这个错误直接down.
查看trace文件发现

SMON: about to recover undo segment 3
SMON: mark undo segment 3 as needs recovery
*** 2012-07-06 18:16:57.734
Block Checking: DBA = 8388649, Block Type = System Managed Segment Header Block
ERROR: SMU Segment Header Corrupted.  Error Code = 38508
ktu4smck: starting extent(0x77) of txn slot #0x11 is  invalid.
  valid value (0 - 0x76)
  TRN CTL:: seq: 0xed38 chd: 0x0020 ctl: 0x002a inc: 0x00000000 nfb: 0x0000
            mgc: 0x8201 xts: 0x0068 flg: 0x0001 opt: 2147483646 (0x7ffffffe)
            uba: 0x00a6610a.ed38.1d scn: 0x0001.d030de86
            Version: 0x01

因为该库是因为undo的3号回滚段的header出现坏块,即使使用了隐含参数屏蔽该回滚段恢复,smon进程依然会去读回滚段header,从而出现该错误导致直接down掉.

处理方案
1.使用隐含参数屏蔽异常回滚段_offline_rollback_segments= _SYSSMU3$
2.修改undo_tablespace=SYSTEM/undo_management=MANUAL
3.启动数据库,快速删除包含_SYSSMU3$ undo表空间
4.新建undo表空间
5.修改undo_tablespace=new_undo/undo_management=AUTO,除掉隐含参数
6.使用新参数文件重启数据库
7.建议:使用逻辑导出导入重建数据库

发表在 Oracle备份恢复 | 标签为 | 2 条评论