标签云
asm恢复 bbed bootstrap$ dul In Memory kcbzib_kcrsds_1 kccpb_sanity_check_2 MySQL恢复 ORA-00312 ORA-00607 ORA-00704 ORA-00742 ORA-01110 ORA-01555 ORA-01578 ORA-01595 ORA-08103 ORA-600 2131 ORA-600 2662 ORA-600 3020 ORA-600 4000 ORA-600 4137 ORA-600 4193 ORA-600 4194 ORA-600 16703 ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1 ORA-600 KCLCHKBLK_4 ORA-15042 ORA-15196 ORACLE 12C oracle dul ORACLE PATCH Oracle Recovery Tools oracle加密恢复 oracle勒索 oracle勒索恢复 oracle异常恢复 Oracle 恢复 ORACLE恢复 ORACLE数据库恢复 oracle 比特币 OSD-04016 YOUR FILES ARE ENCRYPTED 勒索恢复 比特币加密文章分类
- Others (2)
- 中间件 (2)
- WebLogic (2)
- 操作系统 (103)
- 数据库 (1,769)
- DB2 (22)
- MySQL (77)
- Oracle (1,610)
- Data Guard (52)
- EXADATA (8)
- GoldenGate (24)
- ORA-xxxxx (166)
- ORACLE 12C (72)
- ORACLE 18C (6)
- ORACLE 19C (15)
- ORACLE 21C (3)
- Oracle 23ai (8)
- Oracle ASM (69)
- Oracle Bug (8)
- Oracle RAC (54)
- Oracle 安全 (6)
- Oracle 开发 (28)
- Oracle 监听 (29)
- Oracle备份恢复 (592)
- Oracle安装升级 (97)
- Oracle性能优化 (62)
- 专题索引 (5)
- 勒索恢复 (86)
- PostgreSQL (30)
- pdu工具 (6)
- PostgreSQL恢复 (9)
- SQL Server (32)
- SQL Server恢复 (13)
- TimesTen (7)
- 达梦数据库 (3)
- 达梦恢复 (1)
- 生活娱乐 (2)
- 至理名言 (11)
- 虚拟化 (2)
- VMware (2)
- 软件开发 (39)
- Asp.Net (9)
- JavaScript (12)
- PHP (2)
- 小工具 (22)
-
最近发表
- 2025年的Oracle 8.0.5数据库恢复
- ORA-600 kokiasg1故障分析(obj$中核心字典序列全部被恶意删除)
- ORA-00756 ORA-10567故障数据0丢失恢复
- 数据库文件变成32k故障恢复
- tcp连接过多导致监听TNS-12532 TNS-12560 TNS-00502错误
- 文件系统格式化MySQL数据库恢复
- .sstop勒索加密数据库恢复
- 解决一次硬件恢复之后数据文件0kb的故障恢复case
- Error in invoking target ‘libasmclntsh19.ohso libasmperl19.ohso client_sharedlib’问题处理
- ORA-01171: datafile N going offline due to error advancing checkpoint
- linux环境oracle数据库被文件系统勒索加密为.babyk扩展名溯源
- ORA-600 ksvworkmsgalloc: bad reaper
- ORA-600 krccfl_chunk故障处理
- Oracle Recovery Tools恢复案例总结—202505
- ORA-600 kddummy_blkchk 数据库循环重启
- 记录一次asm disk加入到vg通过恢复直接open库的案例
- CHECKDB 发现了 N 个分配错误和 M 个一致性错误
- 达梦数据库dm.ctl文件异常恢复
- Oracle Recovery Tools修复ORA-00742、ORA-600 ktbair2: illegal inheritance故障
- 可能是 tempdb 空间用尽或某个系统表不一致故障处理
分类目录归档:ORA-xxxxx
8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]
一个朋友数据库从8i升级到9i后,出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]错误
alert日志ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]
Mon Jul 16 12:21:54 2012 Errors in file /oracle/admin/ora8/udump/ora8_ora_8938.trc: ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] []
trace文件
--版本平台信息 Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/product/9.2.0 System name: Linux Node name: localhost.localdomain Release: 2.6.18-194.el5PAE Version: #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 22:00:21 EDT 2010 Machine: i686 Instance name: ora8 Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1 Oracle process number: 15 Unix process pid: 8938, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (TNS V1-V3) --trace信息 *** 2012-07-16 12:21:54.399 *** SESSION ID:(12.6) 2012-07-16 12:21:54.399 Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), addr: 0x7, PC: [0x9bfac06, pevm_MOVC_i()+18] Registers: %eax: 0x00000000 %ebx: 0x00000025 %ecx: 0x00000000 %edx: 0xbf93bf50 %edi: 0x00000000 %esi: 0x002ff1d8 %esp: 0xbf93bc28 %ebp: 0xbf93bc60 %eip: 0x09bfac06 %efl: 0x00010296 pevm_MOVC_i()+6 (0x9bfabfa) mov %edi,0xffffffcc(%ebp) pevm_MOVC_i()+9 (0x9bfabfd) mov %esi,0xffffffd0(%ebp) pevm_MOVC_i()+12 (0x9bfac00) mov %ebx,0xffffffc8(%ebp) pevm_MOVC_i()+15 (0x9bfac03) mov 0x14(%ebp),%eax > pevm_MOVC_i()+18 (0x9bfac06) movb 0x7(%eax),%dl pevm_MOVC_i()+21 (0x9bfac09) mov $0x0,0xfffffff0(%ebp) pevm_MOVC_i()+28 (0x9bfac10) movb %dl,0xffffffe0(%ebp) pevm_MOVC_i()+31 (0x9bfac13) movb %dl,0xffffffe0(%ebp) pevm_MOVC_i()+34 (0x9bfac16) cmpb $0x1,%dl *** 2012-07-16 12:21:54.407 ksedmp: internal or fatal error ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] [] ----- Call Stack Trace ----- calling call entry argument values in hex location type point (? means dubious value) -------------------- -------- -------------------- ---------------------------- ksedmp()+269 call ksedst()+0 1 ? 0 ? 0 ? 1 ? 64252C31 ? 6666006C ? ssexhd()+1108 call ksedmp()+0 3 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? pevm_MOVC_i()+18 signal ssexhd()+0 B ? BF93B8BC ? BF93B93C ? pfrrun()+8458 call pevm_MOVC_i()+0 2FF19C ? 16 ? BE14650 ? 0 ? pricar()+1277 call pfrrun()+0 2FF19C ? 1 ? BF93CCFC ? AD638A0 ? 2DFBAC ? 0 ? pricbr()+427 call pricar()+0 BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 9BEAE0C ? 1 ? 0 ? 98C93728 ? prient2()+598 call pricbr()+0 BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 0 ? prient()+1438 call prient2()+0 BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 1 ? BF93E4E0 ? 0 ? kkxrpc()+347 call prient()+0 BF93DA88 ? AD638A0 ? BF93E534 ? 38 ? 1C8C997 ? 0 ? kporpc()+138 call kkxrpc()+0 4C ? F ? BF93E63C ? opiodr()+5238 call kjushutdown()+2671 4C ? F ? BF93E63C ? ttcpip()+2124 call opiodr()+0 4C ? F ? BF93E63C ? 0 ? Cannot find symbol in /lib/libc.so.6. opitsk()+1635 call ttcpip()+0 AD638A0 ? 4C ? BF93E63C ? 0 ? BF93EF14 ? BF93EF10 ? opiino()+602 call opitsk()+0 0 ? 0 ? AD638A0 ? BE01DE0 ? 103 ? 0 ? opiodr()+5238 call kjushutdown()+2671 3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ? opidrv()+517 call opiodr()+0 3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ? 0 ? sou2o()+25 call opidrv()+0 3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ? main()+182 call sou2o()+0 BF9402C4 ? 3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 00125E9C call main()+0 2 ? BF940384 ? BF940390 ? 88A810 ? 0 ? 1 ? ---------------------Binary Stack Dump --------------------- --进程信息 Process global information: process: 0x962ba0b8, call: 0x96342cd8, xact: (nil), curses: 0x962e4070, usrses: 0x962e4070 ---------------------------------------- SO: 0x962ba0b8, type: 2, owner: (nil), flag: INIT/-/-/0x00 (process) Oracle pid=15, calls cur/top: 0x96342cd8/0x96342cd8, flag: (0) - int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0 (post info) last post received: 196 0 4 last post received-location: kslpsr last process to post me: 962b7828 1 6 last post sent: 0 0 15 last post sent-location: ksasnd last process posted by me: 962b7828 1 6 (latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0 Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: 0x962d9444 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 8938 OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 8938, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (TNS V1-V3) ---------------------------------------- SO: 0x962e4070, type: 4, owner: 0x962ba0b8, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00 (session) trans: (nil), creator: 0x962ba0b8, flag: (8000041) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/- DID: 0001-000F-00000004, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000 txn branch: (nil) oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: (nil), psql: 0x98c3b858, user: 95/DDDD O/S info: user: mis, term: LANDERSVR3, ospid: 7904:3012, machine: XANDER\LANDERSVR3 program: c:\orant\bin\f50run32.exe c:\forms\bas9010.fmx application name: c:\orant\bin\f50run32.exe c:\forms\bas9010.fmx, hash value=0 last wait for 'db file sequential read' blocking sess=0x0 seq=1277 wait_time=11 file#=1, block#=21b, blocks=1
1.该用户程序是从8i升级到9i之后产生该错误
2.报错的访问程序是FORM 5
解决方案
查询MOS[ID 273411.1]发现是因为FORM 5和9i不兼容导致该错误,ORACLE未给出解决方案,言外之意,如果FORM不能升级,那就只能把ORACLE重新降级到8i.
温馨提示
在做oracle数据库升级前,需要实现进行评估,测试,如果是oracle相关软件和oracle数据库结合紧密,升级前最好需要和ORACLE技术人员确认是否兼容.
ORA-00600[kcbshlc_1]导致数据库 down 案例
一台服务器因为ORA-00600[kcbshlc_1]错误引起PMON异常导致数据库down掉
Sun Jul 8 17:20:10 2012 Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/xff/bdump/xff_pmon_16412.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcbshlc_1], [33], [], [], [], [], [], [] Sun Jul 8 17:20:12 2012 Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/xff/bdump/xff_pmon_16412.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcbshlc_1], [33], [], [], [], [], [], [] Sun Jul 8 17:20:12 2012 PMON: terminating instance due to error 472
分析trace文件
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options ORACLE_HOME = /opt/oracle/product/10.2.0 System name: Linux Node name: localhost.localdomain Release: 2.6.9-89.ELsmp Version: #1 SMP Mon Apr 20 10:33:05 EDT 2009 Machine: x86_64 Instance name: xff Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1 Oracle process number: 2 Unix process pid: 16412, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (PMON) *** 2012-07-08 03:00:11.351 *** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2012-07-08 03:00:11.338 *** SESSION ID:(1105.1) 2012-07-08 03:00:11.338 wsd 0x1f8169a6c8, sbuf (nil), setid 9, op 0 lcuridx 0, lasz (nil) freeing in-flux r/w latch for process state: 1fc165d248 ... in-flux r/w latch 1fc1fcc9b0 Child cache buffers chains level=1 child#=4753 Location from where latch is held: kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl: Context saved from call: 113266196 state=busy(exclusive) (val=0x2000000000000071) holder orapid = 113 waiters [orapid (seconds since: put on list, posted, alive check)]: 139 (2, 1341687611, 2) 192 (2, 1341687611, 2) 191 (2, 1341687611, 2) 173 (2, 1341687611, 2) 185 (2, 1341687611, 2) 176 (2, 1341687611, 2) 174 (2, 1341687611, 2) 118 (2, 1341687611, 2) 190 (2, 1341687611, 2) 179 (2, 1341687611, 2) 184 (1, 1341687611, 1) 189 (1, 1341687611, 1) 177 (1, 1341687611, 1) 195 (1, 1341687611, 1) 187 (1, 1341687611, 1) 194 (1, 1341687611, 1) 147 (1, 1341687611, 1) 183 (1, 1341687611, 1) 143 (1, 1341687611, 1) 144 (1, 1341687611, 1) 186 (1, 1341687611, 1) 188 (1, 1341687611, 1) 196 (1, 1341687611, 1) 145 (1, 1341687611, 1) 193 (1, 1341687611, 1) waiter count=25 *** 2012-07-08 03:50:06.228 wsd 0x1f8169ac20, sbuf 0xac1ffafe8, setid 10, op 3 lcuridx 1, lasz 0x3c1ffc110 *** 2012-07-08 16:30:05.294 freeing in-flux r/w latch for process state: 20406507f0 ... in-flux r/w latch 1f81265f28 Child cache buffers chains level=1 child#=14180 Location from where latch is held: kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl: Context saved from call: 71341989 state=busy(exclusive) (val=0x2000000000000066) holder orapid = 102 waiters [orapid (seconds since: put on list, posted, alive check)]: 121 (2, 1341736205, 2) 116 (2, 1341736205, 2) 125 (2, 1341736205, 2) 140 (2, 1341736205, 2) 145 (2, 1341736205, 2) waiter count=5 freeing in-flux r/w latch for process state: 1fc165f9d0 ... in-flux r/w latch 1f813aec18 Child cache buffers chains level=1 child#=20914 Location from where latch is held: kcbrls: kslbegin: Context saved from call: 96505705 state=busy(exclusive) (val=0x200000000000007b) holder orapid = 123 *** 2012-07-08 17:20:10.876 wsd 0x1f8169a6c8, sbuf (nil), setid 9, op 0 lcuridx 0, lasz (nil) *** 2012-07-08 17:20:10.876 ksedmp: internal or fatal error ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcbshlc_1], [33], [], [], [], [], [], [] ----- Call Stack Trace ----- calling call entry argument values in hex location type point (? means dubious value) -------------------- -------- -------------------- ---------------------------- ksedst()+31 call ksedst1() 000000000 ? 000000001 ? 7FBFFFCEB0 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? ksedmp()+610 call ksedst() 000000000 ? 000000001 ? 7FBFFFCEB0 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? ksfdmp()+21 call ksedmp() 000000003 ? 000000001 ? 7FBFFFCEB0 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? kgerinv()+161 call ksfdmp() 000000003 ? 000000001 ? 7FBFFFCEB0 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? kgeasnmierr()+163 call kgerinv() 0066876E0 ? 2A97200260 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? kcbshlc()+239 call kgeasnmierr() 0066876E0 ? 2A97200260 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? 000000021 ? kslilcr()+770 call kcbshlc() 0066876E0 ? 1F801DDB28 ? 7FBFFFCF10 ? 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? 000000021 ? ksl_cleanup()+1567 call kslilcr() 7FBFFFCE50 ? 000000000 ? 7FBFFFDCE0 ? 1F801DDB28 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? ksuxfl()+492 call ksl_cleanup() 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 1F801DDB28 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? ksuxda()+55 call ksuxfl() 1FC165B8E0 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 1F801DDB28 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? ksucln()+1390 call ksuxda() 1FC165B8E0 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 1F801DDB28 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? ksbrdp()+794 call ksucln() 060008100 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFF9720ED9F ? 1F801DDB28 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? opirip()+616 call ksbrdp() 060008100 ? 000000000 ? 000000001 ? 060008100 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? opidrv()+582 call opirip() 000000032 ? 000000004 ? 7FBFFFF698 ? 060008100 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? sou2o()+114 call opidrv() 000000032 ? 000000004 ? 7FBFFFF698 ? 060008100 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? opimai_real()+317 call sou2o() 7FBFFFF670 ? 000000032 ? 000000004 ? 7FBFFFF698 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? main()+116 call opimai_real() 000000003 ? 7FBFFFF700 ? 000000004 ? 7FBFFFF698 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? __libc_start_main() call main() 000000003 ? 7FBFFFF700 ? +219 000000004 ? 7FBFFFF698 ? 0066876E0 ? 000000021 ? _start()+42 call __libc_start_main() 000713984 ? 000000001 ? 7FBFFFF848 ? 005288D00 ? 000000000 ? 000000003 ?
通过这个trace可以看出数据库运行在LINUX 64操作系统,版本是10.2.0.4。
出现错误的原因:
PMON在清理1fc165d248的时候,因为被orapid = 102持有,导致清理失败.
PMON在清理20406507f0的时候,因为被orapid = 102持有,导致清理失败.
PMON在清理1fc165f9d0的时候,因为被orapid = 123持有,导致清理失败.
查询MOS[443909.1]
发现是unpublished Bug 4723109.处理方法打上Patch 4723109.
DBCA Fails With ORA-15243
今天接到朋友的电话说他们装ORACLE 11G R1 RAC的时候遇到ORA-12801/ORA-15243错误,请求我帮忙解决
具体情况
AIX系统以前装过11G R2 RAC,现因为项目要求11G R1,已经重装了系统,然后安装R1,在安装到DBCA配置ASM的时候,出现ORA-12801/ORA-15243错误
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server PZ99, instance wmsdb1:+ASM1(1) ORA-15243: 11.2.0.0.0 is not a valid version number
通过SQLPLUS登录ASM1实例查询发现该有一个ORADATA磁盘组,包含了一个/dev/rhdisk1.通过询问,得出结论是这个磁盘组以前是安装R2的时候作为存储OCR和VOTINGDISK使用,重装系统的时候未对该磁盘进行处理.
处理思路[想办法清除磁盘中asm信息]
1.尝试通过sqlplus 删除该磁盘组,报该磁盘组处于dismount状态
2.尝试mount该磁盘组,提示版本无效(ORA-15243)[当前的asm程序是11.1而磁盘组信息是11.2 程序当然不一致了]
3.直接使用dd清理该asm disk header信息(dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rhdisk1 bs=4096 count=1)
4.重新运行dbca一切工作正常
MOS中相关文章[1460997.1]只适合linux asmlib情况
Applies to: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version 11.1.0.7 and later Information in this document applies to any platform. Symptoms On : 11.1.0.7 version, STORAGE When attempting to create database or query gv$asm_diskgroup, the following error occurs. ERROR ----------------------- ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server PZ99, instance dchilcmsdb2.hq.navteq.com:+ASM2 (2) ORA-15243: 11.2.0.0.0 is not a valid version number STEPS ----------------------- The issue can be reproduced at will with the following steps: 1. Previously had 11GR2 installed and configured. Removed this installation then installed 11.1.0.7 and created diskgroups using some of the same disks previously used. 2. Attempt to create database and receive the errors. Drop the newly created diskgroups and query the view still get same errors. BUSINESS IMPACT ----------------------- The issue has the following business impact: Due to this issue, users cannot create new database. Changes Removed 11.2.0.1 installation and installed 11.1.0.7 software without cleaning up all of the diskgroup information from previous installation. Cause All the current information shows that we are using correct binaries and that the diskgroups that are being used have correct comparability settings. HTML shows that the disks for the old diskgroup are still being discovered. This in conjunction with the text of the error as follows shows that we are picking up 11.2.0.0.0 as version from somewhere. ORA-15243: 11.2.0.0.0 is not a valid version number Problem was caused by the disks that had been used for the OCR/Voting disk diskgroup in 11GR2 installation still being present and accessible. Solution As the root user execute /etc/init.d/oracleasm/deletedisk command against all the disks that were previously used for the OCR/Voting disk diskgroup then try the operation again.