标签云
asm恢复 bbed bootstrap$ dul kcbzib_kcrsds_1 kccpb_sanity_check_2 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr MySQL恢复 obet ORA-00312 ORA-00704 ORA-00742 ORA-01110 ORA-01200 ORA-01555 ORA-01578 ORA-01595 ORA-600 2662 ORA-600 2663 ORA-600 3020 ORA-600 4000 ORA-600 4137 ORA-600 4193 ORA-600 4194 ORA-600 16703 ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1 ORA-600 KCLCHKBLK_4 ORA-600 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr ORA-15042 ORA-15196 ORACLE 12C oracle dul ORACLE PATCH Oracle Recovery Tools oracle加密恢复 oracle勒索 oracle勒索恢复 oracle异常恢复 ORACLE恢复 Oracle 恢复 ORACLE数据库恢复 oracle碎片 OSD-04016 YOUR FILES ARE ENCRYPTED 比特币加密文章分类
- MongoDB (1)
- MongoDB恢复 (1)
- Others (2)
- 中间件 (2)
- WebLogic (2)
- 操作系统 (112)
- 数据库 (1,884)
- DB2 (22)
- MySQL (82)
- Oracle (1,709)
- Data Guard (53)
- EXADATA (8)
- GoldenGate (24)
- ORA-xxxxx (168)
- ORACLE 12C (72)
- ORACLE 18C (6)
- ORACLE 19C (15)
- ORACLE 21C (3)
- Oracle 23ai (8)
- Oracle ASM (73)
- Oracle Bug (8)
- Oracle RAC (56)
- Oracle 安全 (6)
- Oracle 开发 (28)
- Oracle 监听 (29)
- Oracle备份恢复 (662)
- Oracle安装升级 (108)
- Oracle性能优化 (62)
- 专题索引 (5)
- 勒索恢复 (91)
- PostgreSQL (37)
- pdu工具 (7)
- PostgreSQL恢复 (13)
- SQL Server (34)
- SQL Server恢复 (14)
- TimesTen (7)
- 达梦数据库 (5)
- 达梦恢复 (3)
- 生活娱乐 (2)
- 至理名言 (11)
- 虚拟化 (2)
- VMware (2)
- 软件开发 (51)
- Asp.Net (9)
- JavaScript (12)
- PHP (2)
- 小工具 (34)
- MongoDB (1)
-
最近发表
- 记录19c ASM磁盘掉线触发ORA-59048故障处理
- aix平台Oracle数据库由于断电无法启动故障处理
- 断电引起ORA-600 3005故障处理
- 记录一次云存储资源到期之后引起的数据库恢复
- Firebird 损坏数据库数据抢救工具—firebirdext
- Oracle 19c 202610补丁(RUs+OJVM)-19.33
- 由于con$.con#值达到极限,触发数据库增加约束报ORA-600 12807错误
- MongoDB 离线提取工具—mongoext
- .bres勒索病毒加密数据库dmp文件可恢复
- ORA-600 krsm_mrp_rebuild_lf_list.lno_mismatch
- 记录一次0丢失的ORA-00354: 损坏重做日志块标头故障恢复
- 不当数据库恢复操作导致一个月数据丢失
- obet快速修复oracle 位图损坏块
- 不太常见的10.2.0.1的oracle redo损坏恢复
- obet forcecopy功能抢救硬件故障中的数据文件
- kcratr_nab_less_than_odr和system坏块故障处理
- 通过obet 恢复system坏块,打开数据库
- obet dbv功能完整说明
- 分享一例运行在aix上的sap系统数据库恢复过程
- OBET-Oracle Block Editor Tool使用说明
分类目录归档:数据库
ORA-07445[kslgetl()+120]/ORA-00108错误解决
一.数据库版本
SQL> select * from v$version; BANNER ---------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
二.alert中发现ORA-07445[kslgetl()+120]/ORA-00108错误
Mon Dec 19 09:19:42 2011 found dead dispatcher 'D000', pid = (13, 1) Mon Dec 19 09:19:42 2011 dispatcher 'D000' encountered error getting listening address Mon Dec 19 09:19:42 2011 Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/gaxt/bdump/gaxt_ora_16297.trc: ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kslgetl()+120] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x000000208] [] [] ORA-00108: failed to set up dispatcher to accept connection asynchronously Mon Dec 19 09:19:45 2011 found dead dispatcher 'D000', pid = (21, 2) Mon Dec 19 09:19:45 2011 dispatcher 'D000' encountered error getting listening address Mon Dec 19 09:19:45 2011 Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/gaxt/bdump/gaxt_ora_16299.trc: ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kslgetl()+120] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x000000208] [] [] ORA-00108: failed to set up dispatcher to accept connection asynchronously
三.trace文件信息
Oracle process number: 15
Unix process pid: 10607, image: oracle@gongantest (D000)
Warning: keltnfy call to ldmInit failed with error 46
*** 2011-12-19 19:21:40.100
network error encountered getting listening address:
NS Primary Error: TNS-12533: TNS:illegal ADDRESS parameters
NS Secondary Error: TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
NT Generic Error: TNS-00503: Illegal ADDRESS parameters
OPIRIP: Uncaught error 108. Error stack:
ORA-00108: failed to set up dispatcher to accept connection asynchronously
Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), addr: 0x208, PC: [0x7a06b8, kslgetl()+120]
*** 2011-12-19 19:21:40.107
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kslgetl()+120] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x000000208] [] []
ORA-00108: failed to set up dispatcher to accept connection asynchronously
Current SQL information unavailable - no session.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
-------------------- -------- -------------------- ----------------------------
ksedst()+31 call ksedst1() 000000000 ? 000000001 ?
2B91BE8F7D50 ? 2B91BE8F7DB0 ?
2B91BE8F7CF0 ? 000000000 ?
ksedmp()+610 call ksedst() 000000000 ? 000000001 ?
2B91BE8F7D50 ? 2B91BE8F7DB0 ?
2B91BE8F7CF0 ? 000000000 ?
ssexhd()+629 call ksedmp() 000000003 ? 000000001 ?
2B91BE8F7D50 ? 2B91BE8F7DB0 ?
2B91BE8F7CF0 ? 000000000 ?
__restore_rt()+0 call ssexhd() 00000000B ? 2B91BE8F8D70 ?
2B91BE8F8C40 ? 2B91BE8F7DB0 ?
2B91BE8F7CF0 ? 000000000 ?
kslgetl()+120 signal __restore_rt() 0600E7560 ? 0000000E8 ?
09AAE5728 ? 0000009A9 ?
000003980 ? 09AAE5740 ?
ksfglt()+108 call kslgetl() 0600E7560 ? 000000001 ?
09AAE5728 ? 0000009A9 ?
000003980 ? 09AAE5740 ?
四.在MOS上找到相关文章[ID 1298804.1]
Applies to: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 11.1.0.6 to 11.1.0.7 - Release: 11.1 to 11.1 Information in this document applies to any platform. Symptoms The following errors are seen in the trace file written by an ORA-7445 [kslgetl]: network error encountered getting listening address: NS Primary Error: TNS-12533: TNS:illegal ADDRESS parameters NS Secondary Error: TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error NT Generic Error: TNS-00503: Illegal ADDRESS parameters OPIRIP: Uncaught error 108. Error stack: ORA-00108: failed to set up dispatcher to accept connection asynchronously Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), addr: 0x130, PC: [0x82f09dc, kslgetl()+80] The trace file indicates that there is no session: Current SQL information unavailable - no session. The Call Stack Trace in the ORA-7445 trace file contains a function list similar to: kslgetl <- PGOSF57_ksfglt <- kghfre <- kmnsbf <- nsbfr <- nsiofrrg <- nsiocancel <- nsopen_shutitdown <- nsclose <- nsgblclose <- nsgblTRMHelper <- nsgblRealTerm <- nlstdstp <- npinlt <- ksuabt <- opidrv <- sou2o <- opimai_real <- main <- libc_start_main Cause The trace file first reports: Warning: keltnfy call to ldmInit failed with error 46 The ORA-7445 is not the starting point here. This exception is just a spin-off from ORA-180 and it is possible that different internal errors may be seen, such as ORA-600 [504], depending on what is happening when the ORA-180 is encountered. The cause for the ORA-180 is related to the inital message at the beginning of the trace file: "keltnfy call to ldmInit failed with error 46" and this is followed by: "network error encountered getting listening address:" The error code (here: 46) is the key for solving the issue. This warning says that ldmInit() returned error 46 which is LDMERR_HOST_NOT_FOUND (host not found). This error is returned if the OS call gethostbyname() fails with an error. So these appears to be a network specific issue. Solution 1) Check permission on /etc/hosts $ ls -l /etc/hosts -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 194 Oct 17 2006 /etc/hosts Check if /etc/hosts file is correctly configured <ip address> <fully qualified hostname> <simple or short hostname> <alias, if applicable> ( all of this on one line ). 2) Check the hostname: $ hostname $ ping `hostname` Make sure you are able to ping the hostname 3) Check if /etc/nodename is correctly configured If you have DNS setup, ping is not a tool to diagnose DNS problem. A better tool to use is nslookup, dnsquery, or dig. $ nslookup <shortname> $ nslookup <long name> $ nslookup <ip address> The forward and reverse lookup should succeed and return consistent address/info. 4) Check nsswitch.conf $ more nsswitch.confhosts: files dnsMake sure host lookup is also done through the /etc/hosts file and not just dns. It is recommended that FILES come first before DNS. Also, check the resolv.conf. This makes sure that the DNS is working properly.
在这里看到虽然数据库的版本不一样,alert和trace中的错误不完全一致,但是很相似。是由于主机名不能被正常访问导致,所以尝试这从主机名相关部分着手解决。
五.查看主机名相关信息,解决问题
[oracle@gongantest ~]$ ls -l /etc/hosts
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 176 Dec 16 13:43 /etc/hosts
[oracle@gongantest ~]$ hostname
gongantest
[oracle@gongantest ~]$ ping gongantest
ping: unknown host gongantest
[oracle@gongantest ~]$ more /etc/hosts
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
#192.168.11.60 gongantest
--发现改主机名的dns被注释掉
[oracle@gongantest ~]$ ping gongantest
PING gongantest (192.168.11.60) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 192.168.9.66 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.9.66 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.9.66 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
--- gongantest ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 3999ms, pipe 3
--除掉注释,测试不通
[root@gongantest ~]# ifconfig
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:22:10:96:CA
inet addr:192.168.9.66 Bcast:192.168.11.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:22ff:fe10:96ca/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4207222 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2482964 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:1156547557 (1.0 GiB) TX bytes:565900103 (539.6 MiB)
--发现该机器的ip为192.168.9.66,修改hosts文件。
--初步确定出现问题的原因是因为机器迁移,使用了新ip,注释掉了hosts文件中错误ip
[root@gongantest ~]# vi /etc/hosts
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
192.168.9.66 gongantest
[oracle@gongantest ~]$ ping gongantest
PING gongantest (192.168.9.66) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from gongantest (192.168.9.66): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.037 ms
64 bytes from gongantest (192.168.9.66): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
64 bytes from gongantest (192.168.9.66): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.033 ms
--- gongantest ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.031/0.033/0.037/0.007 ms
--ping测试正常
继续观察
--观察d000进程是否启动 [oracle@gongantest ~]$ ps -ef|grep ora_ oracle 10180 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_pmon_gaxt oracle 10182 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_psp0_gaxt oracle 10184 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_mman_gaxt oracle 10186 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_dbw0_gaxt oracle 10188 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:02 ora_lgwr_gaxt oracle 10190 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_ckpt_gaxt oracle 10192 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_smon_gaxt oracle 10194 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_reco_gaxt oracle 10196 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_cjq0_gaxt oracle 10198 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_mmon_gaxt oracle 10200 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_mmnl_gaxt oracle 10204 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_s000_gaxt oracle 10210 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_arc0_gaxt oracle 10212 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_arc1_gaxt oracle 10214 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_qmnc_gaxt oracle 10218 1 0 13:23 ? 00:00:00 ora_j000_gaxt oracle 10222 1 0 13:24 ? 00:00:00 ora_q000_gaxt oracle 10234 1 0 13:24 ? 00:00:00 ora_q001_gaxt oracle 10609 1 0 13:32 ? 00:00:00 ora_d000_gaxt oracle 10639 9962 0 13:35 pts/0 00:00:00 grep ora_ --观察alert日志未出现该错误 Mon Dec 26 13:32:18 2011 Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/gaxt/bdump/gaxt_ora_10607.trc: ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kslgetl()+120] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x000000208] [] [] ORA-00108: failed to set up dispatcher to accept connection asynchronously Mon Dec 26 13:32:21 2011 found dead dispatcher 'D000', pid = (13, 85) Mon Dec 26 13:36:04 2011 Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 232 (LGWR switch) Current log# 1 seq# 232 mem# 0: /opt/oracle/oradata/gaxt/redo01.log
至此ORA-07445[kslgetl()+120]/ORA-00108错误解决
记录一次oer 8102.2处理
1.alert日志
Tue Dec 20 22:09:45 2011 Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/admin/BAS/bdump/bas_m000_27442.trc: Wed Dec 21 22:10:45 2011 Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/admin/BAS/bdump/bas_m000_32761.trc: Thu Dec 22 22:11:46 2011 Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/admin/BAS/bdump/bas_m000_5935.trc: Fri Dec 23 22:12:47 2011 Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/admin/BAS/bdump/bas_m000_11382.trc:
Mnnn performs manageability tasks dispatched to them by MMON. Tasks performed include taking Automatic Workload Repository snapshots and Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor analysis.
从这个时间点来看,应该是数据库启动GATHER_STATS_JOB收集统计信息时发现这个错误。
2.bas_m000_11382.trc
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options ORACLE_HOME = /opt/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1 System name: Linux Node name: bas Release: 2.6.9-78.ELsmp Version: #1 SMP Wed Jul 9 15:46:26 EDT 2008 Machine: x86_64 Instance name: BAS Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1 Oracle process number: 24 Unix process pid: 11382, image: oracle@bas (m000) *** ACTION NAME:(Auto-Purge Slave Action) 2011-12-23 22:12:47.074 *** MODULE NAME:(MMON_SLAVE) 2011-12-23 22:12:47.074 *** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2011-12-23 22:12:47.074 *** SESSION ID:(5465.2033) 2011-12-23 22:12:47.074 oer 8102.2 - obj# 4152, rdba: 0x00401f7c(afn 1, blk# 8060) kdk key 8102.2: ncol: 2, len: 10 key: (10): 02 c1 0a 06 00 c0 04 dc 00 00 mask: (4096): 09 00 00 00 00 fb d1 c0 00 00 00 00 00 70 f8 fe bf 7f 00 00 00 cd 7d 5d 01
oer 8102.<code> - obj# <object id>, rdba: <rdba value>(afn <file#>, blk# <block#>) kdk key 8102.2: ncol: <number of columns in the key including the rowid>, len: <key length> key: (<length>):<hexadecimal value> obj#: object_id for the affected index in dba_objects. rdba: relative data block address where the key is supposed to be stored in the index. afn: absolute file number where the affected index block is stored. (file_id in dba_data_files, file# in v$datafile). blk#: Index block number where the key is supposed to be stored.
出现oer 8102.2的错误,有两种可能:1.坏块,2.表和索引数据不一致
3.找出相关对象
SQL> col object_name for a30 SQL> col owner for a10 SQL> select object_name,owner,object_type 2 from dba_objects where object_id=4152; OBJECT_NAME OWNER OBJECT_TYPE ------------------------------ ---------- ------------------- WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS SYS INDEX SQL> select OWNER,TABLE_NAME from dba_indexes 2 where index_name='WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS'; OWNER TABLE_NAME ---------- ------------------------------ SYS WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST SQL> ANALYZE TABLE sys.WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST VALIDATE STRUCTURE CASCADE; ANALYZE TABLE sys.WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST VALIDATE STRUCTURE CASCADE * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01499: table/index cross reference failure - see trace file
4.分析坏块(逻辑/物理)
SQL> ANALYZE INDEX WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS VALIDATE STRUCTURE; Index analyzed. SQL> ANALYZE TABLE WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST VALIDATE STRUCTURE; Table analyzed. [oracle@bas bdump]$ dbv file=/opt/app/oracle/oradata/BAS/system01.dbf DBVERIFY: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Sat Dec 24 21:14:38 2011 Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved. DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = /opt/app/oracle/oradata/BAS/system01.dbf DBVERIFY - Verification complete Total Pages Examined : 552960 Total Pages Processed (Data) : 360156 Total Pages Failing (Data) : 0 Total Pages Processed (Index): 167596 Total Pages Failing (Index): 0 Total Pages Processed (Other): 1961 Total Pages Processed (Seg) : 0 Total Pages Failing (Seg) : 0 Total Pages Empty : 23247 Total Pages Marked Corrupt : 0 Total Pages Influx : 0 Highest block SCN : 2890198330 (2750.2890198330)
检测证明,对象以及对象所属的数据文件,无坏块现象
5.分析表和index不一致
--找出index对应列
SQL> SELECT table_name , column_name from dba_ind_columns
2 WHERE index_name='WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS' order by table_name;
TABLE_NAME COLUMN_NAME
------------------------------ --------------------
WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST TS_ID
--确定对应列是否允许为null
SQL> desc WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
AUTO_TASKID NUMBER
TS_ID NUMBER
OBJN NUMBER
OBJD NUMBER
STATUS VARCHAR2(40)
TASK_ID NUMBER
REASON VARCHAR2(40)
REASON_VALUE NUMBER
CREATION_TIME TIMESTAMP(6)
PROC_TASKID NUMBER
END_TIME TIMESTAMP(6)
SEGMENT_OWNER VARCHAR2(30)
SEGMENT_NAME VARCHAR2(81)
PARTITION_NAME VARCHAR2(30)
SEGMENT_TYPE VARCHAR2(18)
TABLESPACE_NAME VARCHAR2(30)
--确认在表中对应列是否有空值
SQL> SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ count(TS_ID)
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t1
3 WHERE t1.TS_ID IS NULL;
COUNT(TS_ID)
------------
0
--表比index多数据
SQL> SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ TS_ID
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t1
3 MINUS
4 SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */ TS_ID
5 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t where ts_id is not null;
no rows selected
--index中数据条数
SQL> SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */ count(TS_ID)
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t
3 where ts_id is not null;
COUNT(TS_ID)
------------
901
--表中数据条数
SQL> SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ count(TS_ID)
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t1 ;
COUNT(TS_ID)
------------
937
--index中不同值数量
SQL> SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */
2 COUNT(DISTINCT TS_ID)
3 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t WHERE TS_ID IS NOT NULL;
COUNT(DISTINCTTS_ID)
--------------------
5
--表中不同值数量
SQL> SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */ TS_ID
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t WHERE ts_id IS NOT NULL
3 MINUS
4 SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ TS_ID
5 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t1 ;
TS_ID
----------
4
--对比可以知道index中的唯一值比表中,这个也就解释了,为什么表中总条数多,
--但是他们两做减法的时候,记录为空
--索引表比表多数据
SQL> SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */ TS_ID
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t WHERE ts_id IS NOT NULL
3 MINUS
4 SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ TS_ID
5 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t1 ;
TS_ID
----------
4
上面的检测证明:1.表中有索引中无的数据,2.索引中有表中不存在数据
6.解决问题
SQL> alter index WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS rebuild online;
Index altered.
--测试index中总条数
SQL> SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */ count(TS_ID)
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t
3 where ts_id is not null;
COUNT(TS_ID)
------------
937
--无多余index项(以前唯一值为4的记录已经不存在)
SQL> SELECT /*+ index(t WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST_IDX_TS) */ TS_ID
2 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t WHERE ts_id IS NOT NULL
3 MINUS
4 SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ TS_ID
5 FROM WRI$_SEGADV_OBJLIST t1 ;
no rows selected
--通过上述测试,证明表和index不一致问题解决
通过ROWID找回坏块数据
一.准备环境
C:\Users\XIFENFEI>sqlplus chf/xifenfei
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on 星期五 12月 23 10:49:52 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved.
连接到:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Oracle Label Security, OLAP, Data Mining,
Oracle Database Vault and Real Application Testing options
SQL> create tablespace t_xff datafile 'E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\XFF\t_xff01.dbf'
2 size 10m autoextend on next 10m maxsize 1g;
表空间已创建。
SQL> create table t_xifenfei tablespace t_xff
2 as
3 select * from dba_objects;
表已创建。
SQL> select count(*) from t_xifenfei;
COUNT(*)
----------
73286
二.发现坏块
使用ULtraEdit破坏数据(关闭数据库执行)
SQL> select count(*) from t_xifenfei;
select count(*) from t_xifenfei
*
第 1 行出现错误:
ORA-01578: ORACLE 数据块损坏 (文件号 13, 块号 373)
ORA-01110: 数据文件 13: 'E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\XFF\T_XFF01.DBF'
三.查询坏块相关信息
The "LOW_RID" is the lowest rowid INSIDE the corrupt block:
SELECT dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1,<DATA_OBJECT_ID>,<RFN>,<BL>,0) LOW_RID
from DUAL;
The "HI_RID" is the first rowid AFTER the corrupt block:
SELECT dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1,<DATA_OBJECT_ID>,<RFN>,<BL>+1,0) HI_RID
from DUAL;
SQL> col tablespace_name for a30
SQL> col segment_type for a5
SQL> col owner for a10
SQL> col segment_name for a20
SQL> SELECT tablespace_name, segment_type, owner, segment_name
2 FROM dba_extents
3 WHERE file_id =13
4 AND 373 between block_id AND block_id + blocks - 1 ;
TABLESPACE_NAME SEGME OWNER SEGMENT_NAME
------------------------------ ----- ---------- --------------------
T_XFF TABLE CHF T_XIFENFEI
SQL> SELECT data_object_id
2 FROM dba_objects
3 WHERE object_name = 'T_XIFENFEI' and owner='CHF';
DATA_OBJECT_ID
--------------
77759
--坏块的最小rowid
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, 77759,13,373,0) from dual;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_C
------------------
AAAS+/AANAAAAF1AAA
坏块的最大rowid(block+1得到)
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, 77759,13,374,0) from dual;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_C
------------------
AAAS+/AANAAAAF2AAA
四.根据rowid找回数据
SQL> SELECT /*+ ROWID(A) */ COUNT(*) FROM T_XIFENFEI A
2 WHERE ROWID>='AAAS+/AANAAAAF2AAA';
COUNT(*)
----------
55858
SQL> SELECT /*+ ROWID(A) */ COUNT(*) FROM T_XIFENFEI A
2 WHERE ROWID<'AAAS+/AANAAAAF1AAA';
COUNT(*)
----------
17358
SQL> SELECT 77759-55858-17358 from dual;
77759-55858-17358
-----------------
4543
SQL> CREATE TABLE T_XIFENFEI_BAK TABLESPACE T_XFF
2 AS
3 SELECT /*+ ROWID(A) */ * FROM T_XIFENFEI A
4 WHERE ROWID>='AAAS+/AANAAAAF2AAA';
表已创建。
SQL> INSERT INTO T_XIFENFEI_BAK
2 SELECT /*+ ROWID(A) */ * FROM T_XIFENFEI A
3 WHERE ROWID<'AAAS+/AANAAAAF1AAA';
已创建17358行。
SQL> COMMIT;
提交完成。
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_XIFENFEI_BAK;
COUNT(*)
----------
73216
五.和dbms_repair解决坏块对比
SQL> CONN / AS SYSDBA
已连接。
SQL> exec dbms_repair.skip_corrupt_blocks('CHF','T_XIFENFEI');
PL/SQL 过程已成功完成。
SQL> select skip_corrupt from dba_tables where table_name='T_XIFENFEI';
SKIP_COR
--------
ENABLED
SQL> select count(*) from chf.t_xifenfei;
COUNT(*)
----------
73216
通过跳过坏块和rowid功能对比可以看出,两者丢失的数据是相同的,如果有index,同样利用rowid结合index,可能会找回部分数据。当然dbms_repair也提供了类此的功能。两种方法的使用看个人的爱好与习惯。

加我微信(17813235971)
加我QQ(107644445)

