标签云
asm恢复 bbed bootstrap$ dul In Memory kcbzib_kcrsds_1 kccpb_sanity_check_2 MySQL恢复 ORA-00312 ORA-00607 ORA-00704 ORA-00742 ORA-01110 ORA-01555 ORA-01578 ORA-01595 ORA-08103 ORA-600 2131 ORA-600 2662 ORA-600 3020 ORA-600 4000 ORA-600 4137 ORA-600 4193 ORA-600 4194 ORA-600 16703 ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1 ORA-600 KCLCHKBLK_4 ORA-15042 ORA-15196 ORACLE 12C oracle dul ORACLE PATCH Oracle Recovery Tools oracle加密恢复 oracle勒索 oracle勒索恢复 oracle异常恢复 Oracle 恢复 ORACLE恢复 ORACLE数据库恢复 oracle 比特币 OSD-04016 YOUR FILES ARE ENCRYPTED 勒索恢复 比特币加密文章分类
- Others (2)
- 中间件 (2)
- WebLogic (2)
- 操作系统 (103)
- 数据库 (1,764)
- DB2 (22)
- MySQL (77)
- Oracle (1,605)
- Data Guard (52)
- EXADATA (8)
- GoldenGate (24)
- ORA-xxxxx (166)
- ORACLE 12C (72)
- ORACLE 18C (6)
- ORACLE 19C (15)
- ORACLE 21C (3)
- Oracle 23ai (8)
- Oracle ASM (69)
- Oracle Bug (8)
- Oracle RAC (54)
- Oracle 安全 (6)
- Oracle 开发 (28)
- Oracle 监听 (28)
- Oracle备份恢复 (588)
- Oracle安装升级 (97)
- Oracle性能优化 (62)
- 专题索引 (5)
- 勒索恢复 (86)
- PostgreSQL (30)
- pdu工具 (6)
- PostgreSQL恢复 (9)
- SQL Server (32)
- SQL Server恢复 (13)
- TimesTen (7)
- 达梦数据库 (3)
- 达梦恢复 (1)
- 生活娱乐 (2)
- 至理名言 (11)
- 虚拟化 (2)
- VMware (2)
- 软件开发 (39)
- Asp.Net (9)
- JavaScript (12)
- PHP (2)
- 小工具 (22)
-
最近发表
- 文件系统格式化MySQL数据库恢复
- .sstop勒索加密数据库恢复
- 解决一次硬件恢复之后数据文件0kb的故障恢复case
- Error in invoking target ‘libasmclntsh19.ohso libasmperl19.ohso client_sharedlib’问题处理
- ORA-01171: datafile N going offline due to error advancing checkpoint
- linux环境oracle数据库被文件系统勒索加密为.babyk扩展名溯源
- ORA-600 ksvworkmsgalloc: bad reaper
- ORA-600 krccfl_chunk故障处理
- Oracle Recovery Tools恢复案例总结—202505
- ORA-600 kddummy_blkchk 数据库循环重启
- 记录一次asm disk加入到vg通过恢复直接open库的案例
- CHECKDB 发现了 N 个分配错误和 M 个一致性错误
- 达梦数据库dm.ctl文件异常恢复
- Oracle Recovery Tools修复ORA-00742、ORA-600 ktbair2: illegal inheritance故障
- 可能是 tempdb 空间用尽或某个系统表不一致故障处理
- 11.2.0.4库中遇到ORA-600 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr报错
- [MY-013183] [InnoDB] Assertion failure故障处理
- Oracle 19c 202504补丁(RUs+OJVM)-19.27
- Oracle Recovery Tools修复ORA-600 6101/kdxlin:psno out of range故障
- pdu完美支持金仓数据库恢复(KingbaseES)
年归档:2022
ORA-01110 ORA-17070 OSD-04006 故障恢复
有朋友找到我说应用访问数据库和导出数据都报ORA-01110 ORA-17070 OSD-04006之类错误,数据库可以正常open,但是业务访问关键数据和导出报错
对于这个错误,根据以往恢复经验,初步判断可能硬件异常(比如坏道,硬件故障)或者文件系统异常引起,让客户尝试拷贝该文件,确认该文件也无法拷贝

对于这种情况,如果放弃该文件,恢复其他文件数据,那样数据丢失比例太大,直接通过特定恢复工具对其损坏文件进行拷贝,最大限度强求当前文件数据,发现一些扇区损坏跳过继续拷贝

通过坏块检查工具进行检查确认该文件76个block损坏(对于32G的数据文件损坏1M数据,比较好效果)

对坏块进行处理,然后使用expdp导出数据,最大限度抢救数据

fdisk分区导致asm disk破坏数据库恢复
尝试mount data磁盘组
SQL> alter diskgroup DATADG mount NOTE: cache registered group DATADG number=1 incarn=0xbc43fafd NOTE: cache began mount (first) of group DATADG number=1 incarn=0xbc43fafd NOTE: Assigning number (1,0) to disk (/dev/raw/raw2) Thu Jun 02 10:14:33 2022 NOTE: GMON heartbeating for grp 1 GMON querying group 1 at 27 for pid 27, osid 3853 NOTE: Assigning number (1,1) to disk () GMON querying group 1 at 28 for pid 27, osid 3853 NOTE: cache dismounting (clean) group 1/0xBC43FAFD (DATADG) NOTE: messaging CKPT to quiesce pins Unix process pid: 3853, image: oracle@node1 (TNS V1-V3) NOTE: dbwr not being msg'd to dismount NOTE: lgwr not being msg'd to dismount NOTE: cache dismounted group 1/0xBC43FAFD (DATADG) NOTE: cache ending mount (fail) of group DATADG number=1 incarn=0xbc43fafd NOTE: cache deleting context for group DATADG 1/0xbc43fafd GMON dismounting group 1 at 29 for pid 27, osid 3853 NOTE: Disk in mode 0x8 marked for de-assignment NOTE: Disk in mode 0x8 marked for de-assignment ERROR: diskgroup DATADG was not mounted ORA-15032: not all alterations performed ORA-15040: diskgroup is incomplete ORA-15042: ASM disk "1" is missing from group number "1" ERROR: alter diskgroup DATADG mount Thu Jun 02 10:14:33 2022 ASM Health Checker found 1 new failures
报错信息比较明显 datadg的disk number 为1的磁盘丢失了。通过fdisk确认磁盘情况
Disk /dev/sdb: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes 64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 40960 cylinders Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 = 1048576 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0006c2be Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System Disk /dev/sda: 53.7 GB, 53687091200 bytes 64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 51200 cylinders Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 = 1048576 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00061443 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 2 2049 2097152 83 Linux Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda2 2050 10241 8388608 82 Linux swap / Solaris Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda3 10242 12289 2097152 83 Linux Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda4 12290 51200 39844864 5 Extended Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda5 12291 14338 2097152 83 Linux /dev/sda6 14340 50178 36699136 83 Linux /dev/sda7 50180 51200 1045504 83 Linux Disk /dev/sdc: 214.7 GB, 214748364800 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 26108 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x1b3fba6b Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1 1 1045 8393931 83 Linux /dev/sdc2 1046 26108 201318547+ 83 Linux Disk /dev/sdd: 536.9 GB, 536870912000 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 65270 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x4c63ecad Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdd1 1 65270 524281243+ 83 Linux Disk /dev/sde: 536.9 GB, 536870912000 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 65270 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/sdf: 536.9 GB, 536870912000 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 65270 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000
根据客户反馈,异常的应该是一个500G的磁盘,而其中sdb为分区,通过kfed命令分析,确认sdc1为ocr磁盘,sdc2为datadg的一块磁盘,另外一块磁盘应该在sdd,sde,sdf三者之中,通过kfed分析sde,sdf均不可能是asm disk(一块是文件系统,一块是彻底没有使用的空盘),如果datadg的磁盘没有丢失,那应该就是sdd这块磁盘,通过dd 磁盘100M空间,然后通过kfed进行分析确认
E:\TEMP\xff>kfed read sdd.dd kfbh.endian: 0 ; 0x000: 0x00 kfbh.hard: 0 ; 0x001: 0x00 kfbh.type: 0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID kfbh.datfmt: 0 ; 0x003: 0x00 kfbh.block.blk: 0 ; 0x004: blk=0 kfbh.block.obj: 0 ; 0x008: file=0 kfbh.check: 0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000 kfbh.fcn.base: 0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000 kfbh.fcn.wrap: 0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare1: 0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare2: 0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000 006648400 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................] Repeat 26 times 0066485B0 00000000 00000000 4C63ECAD 01000000 [..........cL....] 0066485C0 FE830001 003FFFFF CB370000 00003E7F [......?...7..>..] 0066485D0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................] Repeat 1 times 0066485F0 00000000 00000000 00000000 AA550000 [..............U.] 006648600 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................] Repeat 223 times KFED-00322: Invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0] E:\TEMP\xff>kfed read sdd1.dd kfbh.endian: 0 ; 0x000: 0x00 kfbh.hard: 0 ; 0x001: 0x00 kfbh.type: 0 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_INVALID kfbh.datfmt: 0 ; 0x003: 0x00 kfbh.block.blk: 0 ; 0x004: blk=0 kfbh.block.obj: 0 ; 0x008: file=0 kfbh.check: 0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000 kfbh.fcn.base: 0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000 kfbh.fcn.wrap: 0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare1: 0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare2: 0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000 006768400 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................] Repeat 26 times 0067685B0 00000000 00000000 70D364B4 FE000000 [.........d.p....] 0067685C0 FE83FFFF D13FFFFF BB7603EB 00003A93 [......?...v..:..] 0067685D0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................] Repeat 1 times 0067685F0 00000000 00000000 00000000 AA550000 [..............U.] 006768600 02038201 00000008 80000001 826037C1 [.............7`.] 006768EA0 00000079 00800105 0000007A 00800105 [y.......z.......] 006768EB0 0000007C 00800105 0000007D 00800105 [|.......}.......] 0067693C0 0000015C 00800105 0000015D 00800105 [\.......].......] 0067693D0 0000015F 00800105 00000160 00800105 [_.......`.......] 0067693E0 00000161 00800105 00000163 00800105 [a.......c.......] 0067693F0 00000164 00800105 00000166 00800105 [d.......f.......] KFED-00322: Invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][0] E:\TEMP\xff>kfed read sdd.dd blkn=1|more kfbh.endian: 1 ; 0x000: 0x01 kfbh.hard: 130 ; 0x001: 0x82 kfbh.type: 2 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_FREESPC kfbh.datfmt: 2 ; 0x003: 0x02 kfbh.block.blk: 1 ; 0x004: blk=1 kfbh.block.obj: 2147483649 ; 0x008: disk=1 kfbh.check: 2197087544 ; 0x00c: 0x82f4e538 kfbh.fcn.base: 616391 ; 0x010: 0x000967c7 kfbh.fcn.wrap: 0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare1: 0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare2: 0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000 kfdfsb.aunum: 0 ; 0x000: 0x00000000 kfdfsb.max: 254 ; 0x004: 0x00fe kfdfsb.cnt: 254 ; 0x006: 0x00fe kfdfsb.bound: 0 ; 0x008: 0x0000 kfdfsb.flag: 1 ; 0x00a: B=1 kfdfsb.ub1spare: 0 ; 0x00b: 0x00 kfdfsb.spare[0]: 0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000 kfdfsb.spare[1]: 0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000 kfdfsb.spare[2]: 0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
通过上述信息分析,基本上可以确认sdd磁盘以前是asm disk,但是被fdisk进行了分区,基于这种情况,通过对磁盘组进行修复
E:\TEMP\xff>kfed read sdd.ok kfbh.endian: 1 ; 0x000: 0x01 kfbh.hard: 130 ; 0x001: 0x82 kfbh.type: 1 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_DISKHEAD kfbh.datfmt: 1 ; 0x003: 0x01 kfbh.block.blk: 0 ; 0x004: blk=0 kfbh.block.obj: 2147483649 ; 0x008: disk=1 kfbh.check: 424926402 ; 0x00c: 0x1953dcc2 kfbh.fcn.base: 0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000 kfbh.fcn.wrap: 0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare1: 0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000 kfbh.spare2: 0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.driver.provstr: ORCLDISK ; 0x000: length=8 kfdhdb.driver.reserved[0]: 0 ; 0x008: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.driver.reserved[1]: 0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.driver.reserved[2]: 0 ; 0x010: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.driver.reserved[3]: 0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.driver.reserved[4]: 0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.driver.reserved[5]: 0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.compat: 186646528 ; 0x020: 0x0b200000 kfdhdb.dsknum: 1 ; 0x024: 0x0001 kfdhdb.grptyp: 1 ; 0x026: KFDGTP_EXTERNAL kfdhdb.hdrsts: 3 ; 0x027: KFDHDR_MEMBER kfdhdb.dskname: DATADG_0001 ; 0x028: length=11 kfdhdb.grpname: DATADG ; 0x048: length=6 kfdhdb.fgname: DATADG_0001 ; 0x068: length=11 kfdhdb.capname: ; 0x088: length=0 kfdhdb.crestmp.hi: 33074858 ; 0x0a8: HOUR=0xa DAYS=0x15 MNTH=0xb YEAR=0x7e2 kfdhdb.crestmp.lo: 2375520256 ; 0x0ac: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x1e4 SECS=0x19 MINS=0x23 kfdhdb.mntstmp.hi: 33074858 ; 0x0b0: HOUR=0xa DAYS=0x15 MNTH=0xb YEAR=0x7e2 kfdhdb.mntstmp.lo: 2375522304 ; 0x0b4: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x1e6 SECS=0x19 MINS=0x23 kfdhdb.secsize: 512 ; 0x0b8: 0x0200 kfdhdb.blksize: 4096 ; 0x0ba: 0x1000 kfdhdb.ausize: 1048576 ; 0x0bc: 0x00100000 kfdhdb.mfact: 113792 ; 0x0c0: 0x0001bc80 kfdhdb.dsksize: 512000 ; 0x0c4: 0x0007d000 kfdhdb.pmcnt: 6 ; 0x0c8: 0x00000006 kfdhdb.fstlocn: 1 ; 0x0cc: 0x00000001 kfdhdb.altlocn: 2 ; 0x0d0: 0x00000002 kfdhdb.f1b1locn: 0 ; 0x0d4: 0x00000000 kfdhdb.redomirrors[0]: 0 ; 0x0d8: 0x0000 kfdhdb.redomirrors[1]: 0 ; 0x0da: 0x0000 kfdhdb.redomirrors[2]: 0 ; 0x0dc: 0x0000 kfdhdb.redomirrors[3]: 0 ; 0x0de: 0x0000 kfdhdb.dbcompat: 168820736 ; 0x0e0: 0x0a100000 kfdhdb.grpstmp.hi: 33072461 ; 0x0e4: HOUR=0xd DAYS=0xa MNTH=0x9 YEAR=0x7e2 kfdhdb.grpstmp.lo: 3452534784 ; 0x0e8: USEC=0x0 MSEC=0x260 SECS=0x1c MINS=0x33
使用rman对数据库进行备份,并且重建磁盘组实现数据0丢失
发表在 Oracle备份恢复
标签为 asm disk分区恢复, asm fdisk, asm不能mount, asm恢复, fdisk asm恢复, ORA-15040, ORA-15042
评论关闭
ORA-600 kcvent_internal_02故障处理
数据库启动报ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcvent_internal_02]错,无法正常open
Reconfiguration complete parallel recovery started with 32 processes Started redo scan Completed redo scan read 22775 KB redo, 5055 data blocks need recovery Started redo application at Thread 2: logseq 166395, block 88 Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 2 Group 3 Seq 166395 Reading mem 0 Mem# 0: +DATA/orcl/onlinelog/group_3.283.1036687245 Mem# 1: +FLASH/orcl/onlinelog/group_3.264.1036687257 Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 2 Group 4 Seq 166396 Reading mem 0 Mem# 0: +DATA/orcl/onlinelog/group_4.284.1036687257 Mem# 1: +FLASH/orcl/onlinelog/group_4.265.1036687257 Completed redo application of 15.97MB Completed instance recovery at Thread 2: logseq 166396, block 15854, scn 27533037896 5055 data blocks read, 5055 data blocks written, 22775 redo k-bytes read Thread 2 advanced to log sequence 166397 (thread recovery) Redo thread 2 internally disabled at seq 166397 Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/trace/orcl1_ora_35652472.trc (incident=195549): ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcvent_internal_02], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] Incident details in: /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/incident/incdir_195549/orcl1_ora_35652472_i195549.trc
对应的trace文件信息
Dump continued from file: /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/trace/orcl1_ora_35652472.trc ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcvent_internal_02], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ========= Dump for incident 195549 (ORA 600 [kcvent_internal_02]) ======== *** 2022-06-06 22:17:48.743 dbkedDefDump(): Starting incident default dumps (flags=0x2, level=3, mask=0x0) ----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=5fmpzya54p4hf) ----- ALTER DATABASE OPEN /* db agent *//* {1:38339:2} */ ----- Call Stack Trace ----- calling call entry argument values in hex location type point (? means dubious value) -------------------- -------- -------------------- ---------------------------- skdstdst()+40 bl 0000000109B1E77C 000000000 ? 000000001 ? 000000003 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000001 ? 000000003 ? 000000000 ? ksedst1()+112 call skdstdst() 16F60DC8B26FAB02 ? 4846284100000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFE46D0 ? 283C6E7C6A9A6 ? 10A6B923C ? 000000000 ? 110737880 ? 2050033FFFE46D8 ? ksedst()+40 call ksedst1() 000000000 ? 00000000A ? 07FFFFFFF ? 700000000003670 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000002004 ? 000000001 ? dbkedDefDump()+1516 call ksedst() 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 300000003 ? ksedmp()+72 call dbkedDefDump() 310737880 ? 110000D40 ? FFFFFFFFFFE4EE0 ? 1106AB740 ? 100124BB8 ? 000000000 ? 700011D7387FF08 ? 1106AB740 ? ksfdmp()+100 call ksedmp() 000000002 ? 000000000 ? 000000002 ? 10AF01CA8 ? 10A041C38 ? 000000000 ? 11073C760 ? 110737880 ? dbgexPhaseII()+1904 call ksfdmp() 000000000 ? 00000000A ? 000000002 ? 000000000 ? 000000002 ? 10A041C30 ? 000000000 ? 001050005 ? dbgexProcessError() call dbgexPhaseII() 110737880 ? 11073A970 ? +1556 00002FBDD ? 200000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFE5DF8 ? 00000006C ? 200000000 ? 1000000000 ? dbgeExecuteForError call dbgexProcessError() 110737880 ? 11073C760 ? ()+72 100000703 ? 000004000 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFE9608 ? 000000001 ? 11073E4A8 ? dbgePostErrorKGE()+ call dbgeExecuteForError FFFFFFFFFFE92B0 ? 2044 () 700011D61558BB8 ? 102878B5C ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFE9608 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? dbkePostKGE_kgsf()+ call dbgePostErrorKGE() 07FFFFFFF ? 700000000003670 ? 68 25800000001 ? 109E4A618 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFEA0B0 ? 1109C0040 ? kgeadse()+380 call dbkePostKGE_kgsf() 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 069186EAB ? kgerinv_internal()+ call kgeadse() 000000002 ? 000000002 ? 48 000000001 ? FFFFFFFFFFEAB58 ? 10A4E02F0 ? 000000002 ? FFFFFFFFFFE9FE0 ? 000000000 ? kgerinv()+48 call kgerinv_internal() 200000002 ? 000000002 ? FFFFFFFFFFEA060 ? 000000000 ? 102860EB0 ? FFFFFFFFFFEA458 ? 10285CE74 ? FFFFFFFFFFEA358 ? kgeasnmierr()+72 call kgerinv() 38400000001 ? 000000000 ? 10A4E0D20 ? 497F0A29CAE0 ? 000000001 ? FFFFFFFFFFEA1C0 ? 10A4E0D20 ? 110000D78 ? kcvent_internal()+1 call kgeasnmierr() FFFFFFFFFFEA1C0 ? 200000002 ? 532 1F0410001F041 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000004 ? kctenb_internal()+2 call kcvent_internal() FFFFFFFFFFEB378 ? 200000002 ? 772 FFFFFFFFFFEB448 ? FFFFFFFFFFEB2E8 ? 41F6C57900000000 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFEB330 ? 1106AB740 ? kcfopd()+1508 call kctenb_internal() 07FFFFFFF ? 000000000 ? 000000018 ? FFFFFFFFFFEC380 ? 000000000 ? 110A39050 ? FFFFFFFFFFEC390 ? 000000000 ? adbdrv()+8028 call kcfopd() 081F0AD00 ? 00000000F ? 0FFFED4C0 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFED548 ? 100000000 ? 000000000 ? 1000100000000 ? opiexe()+16048 call adbdrv() 2300000023 ? 100000001 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFF6960 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFF6B60 ? FFFFFFFFFFF6A98 ? 200000002 ? opiosq0()+3984 call opiexe() 700011E117B3B20 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFF7ED8 ? 110000D78 ? 000000001 ? 1109FA438 ? FFFFFFFFFFF7E70 ? 2216414400000001 ? kpooprx()+316 call opiosq0() 300000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? A4000000000000 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFF87F0 ? 28104221FFFF86F0 ? 1109FAB08 ? kpoal8()+872 call kpooprx() 1000CE68C ? 000000001 ? FFFFFFFFFFFAD14 ? 100000001 ? 000000000 ? A40000000000A4 ? 109EB6D00 ? 000000000 ? opiodr()+908 call kpoal8() 100000000 ? 9001000A0091108 ? 000000FFF ? 07FFFFFF8 ? FFFFFFFFFFF8F10 ? 000000018 ? 000000000 ? 000072FFF ? ttcpip()+1028 call opiodr() 5EFFFFA480 ? 1C00200048 ? FFFFFFFFFFFA9F8 ? 000530058 ? 1108BEE30 ? 000000028 ? FFFFFFFFFFFA3A0 ? 1108BEC70 ? opitsk()+1612 call ttcpip() 110135440 ? 000002078 ? 000000000 ? 110000D78 ? 110005210 ? 000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFFAA20 ? 2222208009EF13C0 ? opiino()+940 call opitsk() 110024C58 ? 000000000 ? 11079B550 ? 1107A0850 ? 110737880 ? FFFFFFFFFFFCAE0 ? FFFFFFFFFFFEB3C ? 000000101 ? opiodr()+908 call opiino() 3C006C787C ? BFF0000000000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFFEF60 ? FFFFFFFFFFFD5E9 ? FFFFFFFFFFFD630 ? 1106AB740 ? FFFFFFFFFFFD650 ? 9FFFFFFF000E608 ? opidrv()+1132 call opiodr() 3C0AFBC600 ? 410134340 ? FFFFFFFFFFFEF60 ? 07530312F ? 108820CE4 ? 1106AB740 ? 7264626D732F6F72 ? 1106AB740 ? sou2o()+136 call opidrv() 3C0882A9D0 ? 41170031F ? FFFFFFFFFFFEF60 ? 110017002A0000 ? 0E0DDF00D ? 1106AB740 ? BADC0FFEE0DDF00D ? BADC0FFEE0DDF00D ? opimai_real()+560 call sou2o() FFFFFFFFFFFEFD0 ? BADC0FFEE0DDF00D ? 90000000008BE3C ? BADC0FFEE0DDF00D ? 000000002 ? 9001000A0091108 ? A0000000A000000 ? 10B671248 ? ssthrdmain()+276 call opimai_real() 10B6B1D74 ? 9001000A0095260 ? FFFFFFFFFFFF0B0 ? 10B6B1598 ? FFFFFFFFFFFF0D0 ? FFFFFFFFFFFF428 ? 900000000100968 ? 9001000A0091108 ? main()+204 call ssthrdmain() 240000000 ? FFFFFFFFFFFF418 ? 8FFFFFFF0000090 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? BADC0FFEE0DDF00D ? BADC0FFEE0DDF00D ? __start()+112 call main() 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? 000000000 ? --------------------- Binary Stack Dump ---------------------
该错误在mos,互联网上没有任何信息,不过在alert日志中发现类似信息
Mon Jun 06 23:03:58 2022 Error: Controlfile sequence number in file header is different from the one in memory Please check that the correct mount options are used if controlfile is located on NFS
初步判断可能和这个错误有关系,解决相关问题后,尝试open库
SQL> recover database; ORA-00279: change 27533037896 generated at 06/06/2022 22:17:46 needed for thread 2 ORA-00289: suggestion : +FLASH/orcl/archivelog/2022_06_06/thread_2_seq_166396.6532.1106691471 ORA-00280: change 27533037896 for thread 2 is in sequence #166396 Specify log: {<RET>=suggested | filename | AUTO | CANCEL} Log applied. Media recovery complete. SQL> alter database open; alter database open * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01216: thread 2 is expected to be disabled after CREATE CONTROLFILE SQL> !oerr ora 01216 01216, 00000, "thread %s is expected to be disabled after CREATE CONTROLFILE" // *Cause: A thread that was given during CREATE CONTROLFILE is enabled, but // the datafiles indicate that it should be disabled. This is // probably because the logs supplied to the CREATE CONTROLFILE // are old (from before the disabling of the thread). // *Action: This thread is not required to run the database. The CREATE // CONTROLFILE statement can be reissued without the problem thread, // and, if desired, the thread can be recreated after the database // is open.
ORA-01216这个错误比较也比较少见,但是感觉和thread有关系,大概的意思是thread 被disable了
SQL> select thread#,STATUS FROM V$THREAD; THREAD# STATUS ---------- ------------------ 1 CLOSED 2 CLOSED
通过人工强制把thread个open,然后数据库启动成功
SQL> select thread#,status from v$thread; THREAD# STATUS ---------- ------------------ 1 OPEN 2 CLOSED SQL> alter database open; Database altered.
然后启动thread 2,open 第二个节点
--需要open节点 QL> startup ORACLE instance started. Total System Global Area 1.2961E+11 bytes Fixed Size 2262400 bytes Variable Size 3.3018E+10 bytes Database Buffers 9.6368E+10 bytes Redo Buffers 221818880 bytes ORA-01618: redo thread 2 is not enabled - cannot mount --已经open节点 SQL> ALTER DATABASE ENABLE THREAD 2; Database altered. --需要open节点 SQL> ALTER DATABASE MOUNT; Database altered. SQL> ALTER DATABASE OPEN; Database altered.
xifenfei1:/home/grid$crsctl status res -t -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME TARGET STATE SERVER STATE_DETAILS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local Resources -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ora.DATA.dg ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.FLASH.dg ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.LISTENER.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.OCR.dg ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.asm ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 Started ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 Started ora.gsd OFFLINE OFFLINE xifenfei1 OFFLINE OFFLINE xifenfei2 ora.net1.network ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.ons ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.registry.acfs ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cluster Resources -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ora.LISTENER_SCAN1.lsnr 1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ora.cvu 1 OFFLINE OFFLINE ora.xifenfei1.vip 1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 ora.xifenfei2.vip 1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.oc4j 1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 ora.orcl.db 1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1 Open 2 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei2 Open ora.scan1.vip 1 ONLINE ONLINE xifenfei1