月归档：四月 2020

.ncov加密oracle数据库恢复

发表于 2020 年 4 月 30 日 由 惜分飞

有朋友oracle数据库文件被加密,后缀名为:.id-09C1B27D.[3441546223@qq.com].ncov,
20200430113948

通过分析,运气不错,这个病毒只是加密了少量的oracle block,通过底层分析,该数据库可以open成功
20200430111808
通过一系列处理,数据库open,数据使用expdp导出
20200430182756
对于该类型加密,我们可以对sql server、mysql、oracle恢复出来绝大多数数据,通过不向黑客交赎金的方式,实现绝绝大部分业务数据恢复.

发表在 Oracle, 勒索恢复 | 标签为 , , , , , | 评论关闭

oracle asm中drop pdb恢复方法

发表于 2020 年 4 月 28 日 由 惜分飞

最近分析研究了一种asm disk 数据文件丢失的新恢复方法,通过cod和acd进行恢复,我们对于asm 磁盘组中的文件的改变(创建,删除,扩大,缩小等)操作会体现在cod和acd中有一些体现,类似oracle 数据库中数据的变化都会体现在redo和undo中类似.可以通过对他们的分析,确认文件在asm磁盘组中的分配关系,从而实现数据文件的恢复.我这里通过模拟创建表空间,插入数据,删除表空间(同时也删除文件),然后相关cod和acd分析,实现数据文件恢复.
创建表空间

SQL> create tablespace xifenfei datafile '+data' size 1G;

Tablespace created.

SQL> alter tablespace xifenfei add datafile '+data' size 128M autoextend on;

Tablespace altered.

创建模拟表并插入数据

SQL> create table t_xifenfei tablespace xifenfei as
  2  select * from dba_objects;

Table created.

SQL> insert into t_xifenfei select * from t_xifenfei;

73013 rows created.

…………

SQL> insert into t_xifenfei select * from t_xifenfei;

18691328 rows created.

SQL> COMMIT;

Commit complete.

SQL> SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_XIFENFEI;

  COUNT(1)
----------
  37382656

SQL> alter system checkpoint;

System altered.

SQL> select bytes/1024/1024/1024,TABLESPACE_NAME FROM USER_SEGMENTS  where segment_name='T_XIFENFEI';

BYTES/1024/1024/1024 TABLESPACE_NAME
-------------------- ------------------------------
          5.56738281 XIFENFEI

删除表空间

SQL> drop tablespace xifenfei including contents and datafiles;

Tablespace dropped.

查看alert日志信息

2020-04-23T18:23:43.088997-04:00
drop tablespace xifenfei including contents and datafiles
2020-04-23T18:23:46.226654-04:00
Deleted Oracle managed file +DATA/ORA18C/DATAFILE/xifenfei.262.1035571131
Deleted Oracle managed file +DATA/ORA18C/DATAFILE/xifenfei.263.1038507123
Completed: drop tablespace xifenfei including contents and datafiles

这里我们可以看到被删除的两个数据文件的asm number为262和263,如果要恢复该表空间数据需要先恢复出来该数据文件.由于文件被删除,文件对应存储在asm里面的找出来相关的数据分配关系才可以对其恢复出来.尝试找该文件的分配extent映射关系
尝试直接读取extent map

[root@rac18c2 ~]#  kfed read /dev/xifenfei-sdb  aus=4194304 blkn=0|grep f1b1locn
kfdhdb.f1b1locn:                     10 ; 0x0d4: 0x0000000a
[root@rac18c2 ~]#  kfed read /dev/xifenfei-sdb  aus=4194304 aun=10 blkn=262|more
kfbh.endian:                          1 ; 0x000: 0x01
kfbh.hard:                          130 ; 0x001: 0x82
kfbh.type:                            4 ; 0x002: KFBTYP_FILEDIR
kfbh.datfmt:                          1 ; 0x003: 0x01
kfbh.block.blk:                     262 ; 0x004: blk=262
kfbh.block.obj:                       1 ; 0x008: file=1
kfbh.check:                  4132734069 ; 0x00c: 0xf6548475
kfbh.fcn.base:                     6741 ; 0x010: 0x00001a55
kfbh.fcn.wrap:                        0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare1:                          0 ; 0x018: 0x00000000
kfbh.spare2:                          0 ; 0x01c: 0x00000000
kfffdb.node.incarn:          1035571132 ; 0x000: A=0 NUMM=0x1edcc7de
kfffdb.node.frlist.number:          264 ; 0x004: 0x00000108
kfffdb.node.frlist.incarn:            0 ; 0x008: A=0 NUMM=0x0
kfffdb.hibytes:                       0 ; 0x00c: 0x00000000
kfffdb.lobytes:              1073750016 ; 0x010: 0x40002000
kfffdb.xtntcnt:                       0 ; 0x014: 0x00000000
kfffdb.xtnteof:                     257 ; 0x018: 0x00000101
kfffdb.blkSize:                    8192 ; 0x01c: 0x00002000
kfffdb.flags:                         1 ; 0x020: O=1 S=0 S=0 D=0 C=0 I=0 R=0 A=0
kfffdb.fileType:                      2 ; 0x021: 0x02
…………
kfffdb.mxshad:                        0 ; 0x498: 0x0000
kfffdb.mxprnt:                        0 ; 0x49a: 0x0000
kfffdb.fmtBlks:                  131073 ; 0x49c: 0x00020001
kfffde[0].xptr.au:           4294967295 ; 0x4a0: 0xffffffff
kfffde[0].xptr.disk:              65535 ; 0x4a4: 0xffff
kfffde[0].xptr.flags:                 0 ; 0x4a6: L=0 E=0 D=0 S=0 R=0 I=0
kfffde[0].xptr.chk:                  42 ; 0x4a7: 0x2a
kfffde[1].xptr.au:           4294967295 ; 0x4a8: 0xffffffff
kfffde[1].xptr.disk:              65535 ; 0x4ac: 0xffff
kfffde[1].xptr.flags:                 0 ; 0x4ae: L=0 E=0 D=0 S=0 R=0 I=0
kfffde[1].xptr.chk:                  42 ; 0x4af: 0x2a

这里的kfffdb.blkSize为8192证明以前很可能是数据文件,但是kfffde中的au和disk全部被置为f,说明extent的直接映射表已经被置空,更不用说间接extent分配映射表,也就是说这条路无法走通.变换一种思路,既然文件从asm中删除掉的extent映射关系被清空,那是否可以通过对应的acd记录来找到相关数据.通过对acd进行分析,发现在删除drop的时间点相关类似记录,通过分析对应的acd记录,发现直接extent和扩展extent分配全部被置空,无法通过该思路进行恢复
尝试acd恢复extent map

kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].kfbl.blk:    262 ; 0x1cc: blk=262
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].kfbl.obj:      1 ; 0x1d0: file=1
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].kfcn.base:  6216 ; 0x1d4: 0x00001848
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].kfcn.wrap:     0 ; 0x1d8: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].oplen:        20 ; 0x1dc: 0x0014
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].blkIndex:    262 ; 0x1de: 0x0106
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].flags:        28 ; 0x1e0: F=0 N=0 F=1 L=1 V=1 A=0 C=0 R=0
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].opcode:      162 ; 0x1e2: 0x00a2
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].kfbtyp:        4 ; 0x1e4: KFBTYP_FILEDIR
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].redund:       17 ; 0x1e5: SCHE=0x1 NUMB=0x1
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].pad:       63903 ; 0x1e6: 0xf99f
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xtntcnt:0 ; 0x1e8: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xtntblk:0 ; 0x1ec: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xnum:0 ; 0x1ee: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xcnt:1 ; 0x1f0: 0x0001
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.setflg:0 ; 0x1f2: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.flags:0 ; 0x1f3: O=0 S=0 S=0 D=0 C=0 I=0 R=0 A=0
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].au:4294967292 ; 0x1f4: 0xfffffffc
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].disk:0 ; 0x1f8: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].flags:0 ; 0x1fa: L=0 E=0 D=0 S=0 R=0 I=0
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].chk:41 ; 0x1fb: 0x29
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].au[0]:        10 ; 0x1fc: 0x0000000a
kfracdb2.lge[2].bcd[2].disks[0]:      0 ; 0x200: 0x0000


kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].kfbl.blk:2147483648 ; 0xe54: blk=0 (indirect)
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].kfbl.obj:   262 ; 0xe58: file=262
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].kfcn.base: 3280 ; 0xe5c: 0x00000cd0
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].kfcn.wrap:    0 ; 0xe60: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].oplen:       16 ; 0xe64: 0x0010
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].blkIndex:     0 ; 0xe66: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].flags:       28 ; 0xe68: F=0 N=0 F=1 L=1 V=1 A=0 C=0 R=0
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].opcode:     163 ; 0xe6a: 0x00a3
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].kfbtyp:      12 ; 0xe6c: KFBTYP_INDIRECT
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].redund:      17 ; 0xe6d: SCHE=0x1 NUMB=0x1
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].pad:      63903 ; 0xe6e: 0xf99f
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xtntblk:0 ; 0xe70: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xnum:0 ; 0xe72: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xcnt:1 ; 0xe74: 0x0001
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.ub2spare:0 ; 0xe76: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xptr[0].au:4294967292 ; 0xe78: 0xfffffffc
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xptr[0].disk:0 ; 0xe7c: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xptr[0].flags:0 ; 0xe7e: L=0 E=0 D=0 S=0 R=0 I=0
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].KFFIX_PEXT.xptr[0].chk:41 ; 0xe7f: 0x29
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].au[0]:      296 ; 0xe80: 0x00000128
kfracdb2.lge[20].bcd[1].disks[0]:     0 ; 0xe84: 0x0000

直接通过删除的acd记录来找出来数据文件分配的extent也行不通,通过分析相关acd block,终于找到了对应的extent分配的相关记录

kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].kfbl.blk:     2 ; 0x918: blk=2
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].kfbl.obj:2147483648 ; 0x91c: disk=0
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].kfcn.base: 2820 ; 0x920: 0x00000b04
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].kfcn.wrap:    0 ; 0x924: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].oplen:       28 ; 0x928: 0x001c
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].blkIndex:     2 ; 0x92a: 0x0002
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].flags:       28 ; 0x92c: F=0 N=0 F=1 L=1 V=1 A=0 C=0 R=0
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].opcode:      73 ; 0x92e: 0x0049
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].kfbtyp:       3 ; 0x930: KFBTYP_ALLOCTBL
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].redund:      18 ; 0x931: SCHE=0x1 NUMB=0x2
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].pad:      63903 ; 0x932: 0xf99f
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.curidx:2416 ; 0x934: 0x0970
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.nxtidx:8 ; 0x936: 0x0008
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.prvidx:8 ; 0x938: 0x0008
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.asz:0 ; 0x93a: KFDASZ_1X
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.frag:0 ; 0x93b: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.total:0 ; 0x93c: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.free:0 ; 0x93e: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.fnum:262 ; 0x940: 0x00000106
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.xnum:0 ; 0x944: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.vaa.flags:8388608 ; 0x948: 0x00800000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.lxnum:3 ; 0x94c: 0x03
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.spare1:0 ; 0x94d: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].KFDAT_ALLOC2.spare2:0 ; 0x94e: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].au[0]:        0 ; 0x950: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].au[1]:       11 ; 0x954: 0x0000000b
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].disks[0]:     0 ; 0x958: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[0].disks[1]:     0 ; 0x95a: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].kfbl.blk:   262 ; 0x95c: blk=262
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].kfbl.obj:     1 ; 0x960: file=1
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].kfcn.base: 3018 ; 0x964: 0x00000bca
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].kfcn.wrap:    0 ; 0x968: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].oplen:       20 ; 0x96c: 0x0014
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].blkIndex:   262 ; 0x96e: 0x0106
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].flags:       28 ; 0x970: F=0 N=0 F=1 L=1 V=1 A=0 C=0 R=0
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].opcode:     162 ; 0x972: 0x00a2
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].kfbtyp:       4 ; 0x974: KFBTYP_FILEDIR
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].redund:      17 ; 0x975: SCHE=0x1 NUMB=0x1
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].pad:      63903 ; 0x976: 0xf99f
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xtntcnt:0 ; 0x978: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xtntblk:0 ; 0x97c: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xnum:0 ; 0x97e: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xcnt:1 ; 0x980: 0x0001
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.setflg:0 ; 0x982: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.flags:0 ; 0x983: O=0 S=0 S=0 D=0 C=0 I=0 R=0 A=0
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].au:297 ; 0x984: 0x00000129
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].disk:0 ; 0x988: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].flags:0 ; 0x98a: L=0 E=0 D=0 S=0 R=0 I=0
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].KFFFD_PEXT.xptr[0].chk:2 ; 0x98b: 0x02
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].au[0]:       10 ; 0x98c: 0x0000000a
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[1].disks[0]:     0 ; 0x990: 0x0000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].kfbl.blk:     2 ; 0x994: blk=2
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].kfbl.obj:     4 ; 0x998: file=4
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].kfcn.base: 3019 ; 0x99c: 0x00000bcb
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].kfcn.wrap:    0 ; 0x9a0: 0x00000000
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].oplen:        8 ; 0x9a4: 0x0008
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].blkIndex:     2 ; 0x9a6: 0x0002
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].flags:       28 ; 0x9a8: F=0 N=0 F=1 L=1 V=1 A=0 C=0 R=0
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].opcode:     211 ; 0x9aa: 0x00d3
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].kfbtyp:      16 ; 0x9ac: KFBTYP_COD_DATA
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].redund:      17 ; 0x9ad: SCHE=0x1 NUMB=0x1
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].pad:      63903 ; 0x9ae: 0xf99f
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].KFRCOD_DATA.offset:60 ; 0x9b0: 0x003c
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].KFRCOD_DATA.length:4 ; 0x9b2: 0x0004
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].KFRCOD_DATA.data[0]:1 ; 0x9b4: 0x01
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].KFRCOD_DATA.data[1]:0 ; 0x9b5: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].KFRCOD_DATA.data[2]:0 ; 0x9b6: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].KFRCOD_DATA.data[3]:0 ; 0x9b7: 0x00
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].au[0]:       16 ; 0x9b8: 0x00000010
kfracdb2.lge[21].bcd[2].disks[0]:     0 ; 0x9bc: 0x0000

对于类似这样的记录,通过汇总处理获得所有的file number对应的au extent分配记录,并且生成dd语句,然后生成文件
20200428213654

dbv检查恢复文件

[oracle@rac18c2 tmp]$ dbv file=262.dbf

DBVERIFY: Release 18.0.0.0.0 - Production on Tue Apr 28 09:45:37 2020

Copyright (c) 1982, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.

DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = /tmp/262.dbf


DBVERIFY - Verification complete

Total Pages Examined         : 131072
Total Pages Processed (Data) : 123400
Total Pages Failing   (Data) : 0
Total Pages Processed (Index): 0
Total Pages Failing   (Index): 0
Total Pages Processed (Other): 631
Total Pages Processed (Seg)  : 0
Total Pages Failing   (Seg)  : 0
Total Pages Empty            : 7041
Total Pages Marked Corrupt   : 0
Total Pages Influx           : 0
Total Pages Encrypted        : 0
Highest block SCN            : 10001146011 (2.1411211419)

[oracle@rac18c2 tmp]$ dbv file=263.dbf

DBVERIFY: Release 18.0.0.0.0 - Production on Tue Apr 28 09:51:05 2020

Copyright (c) 1982, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.

DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = /tmp/263.dbf



DBVERIFY - Verification complete

Total Pages Examined         : 643584
Total Pages Processed (Data) : 595146
Total Pages Failing   (Data) : 0
Total Pages Processed (Index): 0
Total Pages Failing   (Index): 0
Total Pages Processed (Other): 821
Total Pages Processed (Seg)  : 0
Total Pages Failing   (Seg)  : 0
Total Pages Empty            : 36865
Total Pages Marked Corrupt   : 0
Total Pages Influx           : 0
Total Pages Encrypted        : 0
Highest block SCN            : 10001153042 (2.1411218450)
[oracle@rac18c2 tmp]$

dul确认恢复文件中数据

DUL>  scan database
start scan database in parallel 1...
scan database completed.
DUL> sample all segment 
start get segment info: data_obj#: 74635
finish get segment info: data_obj#: 74635
guess col def: 22
write segment info: 74635, 1, 8, 22
write sample rows: 10000
DUL> unload object 74635
 2020-04-24 22:32:11 unloading table segment 74635...
 2020-04-24 22:35:36 unloaded 37382656 rows.
DUL>

通过dbv和实际数据条数对比,此种恢复恢复的数据完全正常,不用使用底层碎片扫描,亦可恢复asm中被删除数据文件数据.在某些特殊情况下,此类方法配合底层碎片恢复,可以实现更加完美的恢复效果.对于比较典型的oracle pdb被删除(因为有多个数据文件的文件号是一样的,无法直接通过底层碎片扫描恢复),通过此类方法可以非常好的恢复出来.
类似文章参考:
asm disk header 彻底损坏恢复
ASM未正常启动,使用dd找回数据文件
asm磁盘组操作不当导致数据文件丢失恢复
如果你不幸遭遇asm 数据文件被删除/丢失,或者误删除pdb等相关事宜,如果需要恢复可以联系我们,提供专业数据库恢复服务
Phone:17813235971    Q Q:107644445QQ咨询惜分飞    E-Mail:dba@xifenfei.com

发表在 非常规恢复 | 标签为 , , , , , , , | 2 条评论

asm disk被加入vg恢复

发表于 2020 年 4 月 26 日 由 惜分飞

接到客户恢复请求:把oracle asm datagroup中的一个磁盘增加到vg中,现在磁盘组无法mount,数据库无法正常启动.远程登录现场进行分析发现情况如下:
操作系统层面分析
history操作记录
add_asm_disk_to_vg

这里比较明显把一个磁盘做成pv,并且加入到vg中,然后再分配199G给lv_home,系统层面分析lvm信息

--查看pv信息
[root@xff1 ~]# pvdisplay 
  --- Physical volume ---
  PV Name               /dev/sda2
  VG Name               VolGroup
  PV Size               277.98 GiB / not usable 3.00 MiB
  Allocatable           yes (but full)
  PE Size               4.00 MiB
  Total PE              71161
  Free PE               0
  Allocated PE          71161
  PV UUID               F6QO3f-065n-mwTW-Xbq2-Xx2y-c8HD-Tkr7V7
   
  --- Physical volume ---
  PV Name               /dev/sdg    <----新加入的磁盘
  VG Name               VolGroup
  PV Size               200.00 GiB / not usable 4.00 MiB
  Allocatable           yes 
  PE Size               4.00 MiB
  Total PE              51199
  Free PE               255
  Allocated PE          50944
  PV UUID               i69vUG-nCIK-dtxL-FvpD-2WZd-bvLv-n7lwrb

[root@xff1 ~]# lvdisplay 
  --- Logical volume ---
  LV Path                /dev/VolGroup/lv_root
  LV Name                lv_root
  VG Name                VolGroup
  LV UUID                JUNnkN-m4zq-D0gh-h42b-cUM1-Wh1q-ZMtQE4
  LV Write Access        read/write
  LV Creation host, time localhost.localdomain, 2017-07-19 20:08:47 +0800
  LV Status              available
  # open                 1
  LV Size                50.00 GiB
  Current LE             12800
  Segments               1
  Allocation             inherit
  Read ahead sectors     auto
  - currently set to     256
  Block device           253:0
   
  --- Logical volume ---
  LV Path                /dev/VolGroup/lv_home
  LV Name                lv_home
  VG Name                VolGroup
  LV UUID                eZTkLt-cNGX-371i-m8Bd-VdD9-q6Hz-wYDRIJ
  LV Write Access        read/write
  LV Creation host, time localhost.localdomain, 2017-07-19 20:08:54 +0800
  LV Status              available
  # open                 1
  LV Size                422.97 GiB      <-----lv大小变成422G,应该是被扩了199G后结果
  Current LE             108281
  Segments               2
  Allocation             inherit
  Read ahead sectors     auto
  - currently set to     256
  Block device           253:2
   
  --- Logical volume ---
  LV Path                /dev/VolGroup/lv_swap
  LV Name                lv_swap
  VG Name                VolGroup
  LV UUID                54P9ok-VpwO-zM68-hvwY-9GBf-89yb-8xQAMn
  LV Write Access        read/write
  LV Creation host, time localhost.localdomain, 2017-07-19 20:09:23 +0800
  LV Status              available
  # open                 1
  LV Size                4.00 GiB
  Current LE             1024
  Segments               1
  Allocation             inherit
  Read ahead sectors     auto
  - currently set to     256
  Block device           253:1


[root@xff1 ~]# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root
                       50G  3.9G   43G   9% /
tmpfs                  63G  509M   63G   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1             477M   44M  408M  10% /boot
/dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_home
                      417G  226G  170G  58% /home  <----增加了199g空间,剩余只剩170G,证明增加空间之后最少使用了30G以上

基于这样的情况,基本上可以确定sdg盘加入VolGroup中并且被分配给 lv_home中,而且还写入了数据(/home空闲空间只剩余170G,lv_home当时扩了199G).
asm层面分析
asm磁盘组无法mount,提示缺少一块磁盘

SQL> ALTER DISKGROUP DATA MOUNT  /* asm agent *//* {1:12056:279} */ 
NOTE: cache registered group DATA number=1 incarn=0xa1dbff16
NOTE: cache began mount (first) of group DATA number=1 incarn=0xa1dbff16
NOTE: Assigning number (1,2) to disk (/dev/asmdisk3)
NOTE: Assigning number (1,1) to disk (/dev/asmdisk2)
Sat Apr 25 13:04:58 2020
ERROR: no read quorum in group: required 1, found 0 disks
NOTE: cache dismounting (clean) group 1/0xA1DBFF16 (DATA) 
NOTE: messaging CKPT to quiesce pins Unix process pid: 81552, image: oracle@rac2db1 (TNS V1-V3)
NOTE: dbwr not being msg'd to dismount
NOTE: lgwr not being msg'd to dismount
NOTE: cache dismounted group 1/0xA1DBFF16 (DATA) 
NOTE: cache ending mount (fail) of group DATA number=1 incarn=0xa1dbff16
NOTE: cache deleting context for group DATA 1/0xa1dbff16
GMON dismounting group 1 at 19 for pid 30, osid 81552
NOTE: Disk DATA_0001 in mode 0x9 marked for de-assignment
NOTE: Disk DATA_0002 in mode 0x9 marked for de-assignment
ERROR: diskgroup DATA was not mounted
ORA-15032: not all alterations performed
ORA-15017: diskgroup "DATA" cannot be mounted
ORA-15040: diskgroup is incomplete
ERROR: ALTER DISKGROUP DATA MOUNT  /* asm agent *//* {1:12056:279} */

kfed分析磁盘信息
kfed_lvm

报错比较明显asm disk磁盘头被lvm的信息取代(因为asm disk 被加入到vg中),根据前面的分析,该磁盘被写入数据很可能超过30G,使用kfed分析一个随意au,确认被破坏,证明开始判断基本正确

root@xff1:/home/oracle11g$kfed read /dev/asmdisk1 aun=10000
kfbh.endian:                         51 ; 0x000: 0x33
kfbh.hard:                           55 ; 0x001: 0x37
kfbh.type:                           32 ; 0x002: *** Unknown Enum ***
kfbh.datfmt:                         42 ; 0x003: 0x2a
kfbh.block.blk:              1329801248 ; 0x004: blk=1329801248
kfbh.block.obj:              1128615502 ; 0x008: file=347726
kfbh.check:                  1094999892 ; 0x00c: 0x41445f54
kfbh.fcn.base:                675103060 ; 0x010: 0x283d4154
kfbh.fcn.wrap:               1448232275 ; 0x014: 0x56524553
kfbh.spare1:                 1598374729 ; 0x018: 0x5f454349
kfbh.spare2:                 1162690894 ; 0x01c: 0x454d414e
7F7843EAD400 2A203733 4F432820 43454E4E 41445F54  [37 * (CONNECT_DA]
7F7843EAD410 283D4154 56524553 5F454349 454D414E  [TA=(SERVICE_NAME]
7F7843EAD420 6361723D 29626432 44494328 5250283D  [=rac2db)(CID=(PR]
7F7843EAD430 4152474F 3A443D4D 4341505C DFCF3153  [OGRAM=D:\PACS1..]
7F7843EAD440 B3BEB7BB 6369445C 65536D6F 72657672  [....\DicomServer]
7F7843EAD450 445C524D 6D6F6369 76726553 524D7265  [MR\DicomServerMR]
7F7843EAD460 6578652E 4F482829 573D5453 362D4E49  [.exe)(HOST=WIN-6]
7F7843EAD470 51414C38 54553645 28294A30 52455355  [8LAQE6UT0J)(USER]
7F7843EAD480 6D64413D 73696E69 74617274 2929726F  [=Administrator))]
7F7843EAD490 202A2029 44444128 53534552 5250283D  [) * (ADDRESS=(PR]
7F7843EAD4A0 434F544F 743D4C4F 28297063 54534F48  [OTOCOL=tcp)(HOST]
7F7843EAD4B0 2E30313D 2E303831 30332E31 4F502829  [=10.180.1.30)(PO]
7F7843EAD4C0 343D5452 37333539 2A202929 74736520  [RT=49537)) * est]
7F7843EAD4D0 696C6261 2A206873 63617220 20626432  [ablish * rac2db ]
7F7843EAD4E0 3231202A 0A343135 2D534E54 31353231  [* 12514.TNS-1251]
7F7843EAD4F0 54203A34 6C3A534E 65747369 2072656E  [4: TNS:listener ]
7F7843EAD500 73656F64 746F6E20 72756320 746E6572  [does not current]
7F7843EAD510 6B20796C 20776F6E 7320666F 69767265  [ly know of servi]
7F7843EAD520 72206563 65757165 64657473 206E6920  [ce requested in ]
7F7843EAD530 6E6E6F63 20746365 63736564 74706972  [connect descript]
………………
7F7843EAE300 6F636944 7265536D 4D726576 69445C52  [DicomServerMR\Di]
7F7843EAE310 536D6F63 65767265 2E524D72 29657865  [comServerMR.exe)]
7F7843EAE320 534F4828 49573D54 4F302D4E 314B304A  [(HOST=WIN-0OJ0K1]
7F7843EAE330 4955304E 55282954 3D524553 696D6441  [N0UIT)(USER=Admi]
7F7843EAE340 7473696E 6F746172 29292972 28202A20  [nistrator))) * (]
7F7843EAE350 52444441 3D535345 4F525028 4F434F54  [ADDRESS=(PROTOCO]
7F7843EAE360 63743D4C 48282970 3D54534F 312E3031  [L=tcp)(HOST=10.1]
7F7843EAE370 312E3038 2930332E 524F5028 35353D54  [80.1.30)(PORT=55]
7F7843EAE380 29383632 202A2029 61747365 73696C62  [268)) * establis]
7F7843EAE390 202A2068 32636172 2A206264 35323120  [h * rac2db * 125]
7F7843EAE3A0 540A3431 312D534E 34313532 4E54203A  [14.TNS-12514: TN]
7F7843EAE3B0 696C3A53 6E657473 64207265 2073656F  [S:listener does ]
7F7843EAE3C0 20746F6E 72727563 6C746E65 6E6B2079  [not currently kn]
7F7843EAE3D0 6F20776F 65732066 63697672 65722065  [ow of service re]
7F7843EAE3E0 73657571 20646574 63206E69 656E6E6F  [quested in conne]
7F7843EAE3F0 64207463 72637365 6F747069 34320A72  [ct descriptor.24]
KFED-00322: Invalid content encountered during block traversal: [kfbtTraverseBlock][Invalid OSM block type][][32]

通过上述kfed可以看到第10000 au的位置被写入的是数据库异常之后listener.log的信息(该数据库安装在/home目录中),进一步证明覆盖,通过以下信息证明sdg就是asmdisk1

[root@xff1 dev]# ls -l sdg
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8,  96 Apr 25 00:05 sdg
[root@xff1 dev]# ls -l asmdisk1
brw-rw---- 1 grid asmadmin 8,  96 Apr 25 00:05 asmdisk1

基于现在的情况,data磁盘组是由三块 200G的磁盘组成,第一块磁盘被意外加入vg,并且写入数据大于30G,无法从asm层面直接通过kfed修复磁盘组,然后直接mount,只能通过oracle asm磁盘数据块重组技术(asm disk header 彻底损坏恢复)实现没有覆盖数据的恢复.
20200426202310

该客户运气还不错,通过仅剩的2019年12月份几天的不成功备份找出来所有的数据文件（无归档）,然后强制拉库成功.通过碎片恢复的最新的数据文件数据结合2019年12月份备份,实现绝大部分业务数据恢复,最大限度减少客户损失.对于oracle rac数据库服务器磁盘操作需要谨慎.
如果不幸有类似oracle asm disk被破坏(格式化,dd部分,做成lv等),需要进行恢复支持,可以联系我们,做专业的恢复评估,最大限度,最快速度抢救数据,减少损失
Phone:17813235971    Q Q:107644445QQ咨询惜分飞    E-Mail:dba@xifenfei.com
恢复过部分asm被格式化案例:
又一例asm格式化文件系统恢复
一次完美的asm disk被格式化ntfs恢复
oracle asm disk格式化恢复—格式化为ext4文件系统
oracle asm disk格式化恢复—格式化为ntfs文件系统

发表在 非常规恢复 | 标签为 , , , , | 评论关闭