8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]

联系:手机(+86 13429648788) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

一个朋友数据库从8i升级到9i后,出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]错误
alert日志ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]

Mon Jul 16 12:21:54 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/ora8/udump/ora8_ora_8938.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] []

trace文件

--版本平台信息
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/product/9.2.0
System name:	Linux
Node name:	localhost.localdomain
Release:	2.6.18-194.el5PAE
Version:	#1 SMP Tue Mar 16 22:00:21 EDT 2010
Machine:	i686
Instance name: ora8
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 15
Unix process pid: 8938, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (TNS V1-V3)

--trace信息
*** 2012-07-16 12:21:54.399
*** SESSION ID:(12.6) 2012-07-16 12:21:54.399
Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), addr: 0x7, PC: [0x9bfac06, pevm_MOVC_i()+18]
Registers:
%eax: 0x00000000 %ebx: 0x00000025 %ecx: 0x00000000
%edx: 0xbf93bf50 %edi: 0x00000000 %esi: 0x002ff1d8
%esp: 0xbf93bc28 %ebp: 0xbf93bc60 %eip: 0x09bfac06
%efl: 0x00010296
  pevm_MOVC_i()+6 (0x9bfabfa) mov %edi,0xffffffcc(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+9 (0x9bfabfd) mov %esi,0xffffffd0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+12 (0x9bfac00) mov %ebx,0xffffffc8(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+15 (0x9bfac03) mov 0x14(%ebp),%eax
> pevm_MOVC_i()+18 (0x9bfac06) movb 0x7(%eax),%dl
  pevm_MOVC_i()+21 (0x9bfac09) mov $0x0,0xfffffff0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+28 (0x9bfac10) movb %dl,0xffffffe0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+31 (0x9bfac13) movb %dl,0xffffffe0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+34 (0x9bfac16) cmpb $0x1,%dl
*** 2012-07-16 12:21:54.407
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] []
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling              call     entry                argument values in hex      
location             type     point                (? means dubious value)     
-------------------- -------- -------------------- ----------------------------
ksedmp()+269         call     ksedst()+0           1 ? 0 ? 0 ? 1 ? 64252C31 ?
                                                   6666006C ?
ssexhd()+1108        call     ksedmp()+0           3 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ?
pevm_MOVC_i()+18     signal   ssexhd()+0           B ? BF93B8BC ? BF93B93C ?
pfrrun()+8458        call     pevm_MOVC_i()+0      2FF19C ? 16 ? BE14650 ? 0 ?
pricar()+1277        call     pfrrun()+0           2FF19C ? 1 ? BF93CCFC ?
                                                   AD638A0 ? 2DFBAC ? 0 ?
pricbr()+427         call     pricar()+0           BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ?
                                                   9BEAE0C ? 1 ? 0 ? 98C93728 ?
prient2()+598        call     pricbr()+0           BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 0 ?
prient()+1438        call     prient2()+0          BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 1 ?
                                                   BF93E4E0 ? 0 ?
kkxrpc()+347         call     prient()+0           BF93DA88 ? AD638A0 ?
                                                   BF93E534 ? 38 ? 1C8C997 ? 0 ?
kporpc()+138         call     kkxrpc()+0           4C ? F ? BF93E63C ?
opiodr()+5238        call     kjushutdown()+2671   4C ? F ? BF93E63C ?
ttcpip()+2124        call     opiodr()+0           4C ? F ? BF93E63C ? 0 ?
Cannot find symbol in /lib/libc.so.6.
opitsk()+1635        call     ttcpip()+0           AD638A0 ? 4C ? BF93E63C ? 0 ?
                                                   BF93EF14 ? BF93EF10 ?
opiino()+602         call     opitsk()+0           0 ? 0 ? AD638A0 ? BE01DE0 ?
                                                   103 ? 0 ?
opiodr()+5238        call     kjushutdown()+2671   3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ?
opidrv()+517         call     opiodr()+0           3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ? 0 ?
sou2o()+25           call     opidrv()+0           3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ?
main()+182           call     sou2o()+0            BF9402C4 ? 3C ? 4 ?
                                                   BF9402E0 ? 0 ? 0 ?
00125E9C             call     main()+0             2 ? BF940384 ? BF940390 ?
                                                   88A810 ? 0 ? 1 ?
 
---------------------Binary Stack Dump ---------------------

--进程信息
Process global information:
     process: 0x962ba0b8, call: 0x96342cd8, xact: (nil), curses: 0x962e4070, usrses: 0x962e4070
  ----------------------------------------
  SO: 0x962ba0b8, type: 2, owner: (nil), flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
  (process) Oracle pid=15, calls cur/top: 0x96342cd8/0x96342cd8, flag: (0) -
            int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0
  (post info) last post received: 196 0 4
              last post received-location: kslpsr
              last process to post me: 962b7828 1 6
              last post sent: 0 0 15
              last post sent-location: ksasnd
              last process posted by me: 962b7828 1 6
    (latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0
    Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: 0x962d9444
    O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 8938
    OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 8938, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (TNS V1-V3)
    ----------------------------------------
    SO: 0x962e4070, type: 4, owner: 0x962ba0b8, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (session) trans: (nil), creator: 0x962ba0b8, flag: (8000041) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-
              DID: 0001-000F-00000004, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000
              txn branch: (nil)
              oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: (nil), psql: 0x98c3b858, user: 95/DDDD
    O/S info: user: mis, term: LANDERSVR3, ospid: 7904:3012, machine: XANDER\LANDERSVR3
              program: c:\orant\bin\f50run32.exe c:\forms\bas9010.fmx
    application name: c:\orant\bin\f50run32.exe c:\forms\bas9010.fmx, hash value=0
    last wait for 'db file sequential read' blocking sess=0x0 seq=1277 wait_time=11
                file#=1, block#=21b, blocks=1

1.该用户程序是从8i升级到9i之后产生该错误
2.报错的访问程序是FORM 5

解决方案
查询MOS[ID 273411.1]发现是因为FORM 5和9i不兼容导致该错误,ORACLE未给出解决方案,言外之意,如果FORM不能升级,那就只能把ORACLE重新降级到8i.

温馨提示
在做oracle数据库升级前,需要实现进行评估,测试,如果是oracle相关软件和oracle数据库结合紧密,升级前最好需要和ORACLE技术人员确认是否兼容.

此条目发表在 ORA-xxxxx 分类目录,贴了 标签。将固定链接加入收藏夹。

8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]》有 1 条评论

  1. 惜分飞 说:

    Error: ORA-07445 [Pevm_movc_i()+18] while running Forms application [ID 273411.1]

    Applies To
    Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 9.2.0.5
    This problem can occur on any platform.
    
    Symptoms
    You received following error in alert.log while running Forms application:
    
    ORA-07445:exception encountered:core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] []
    
    Stack Trace:- pevm_MOVC_i pfrrun pricar pricbr prient2 prient kkxrpc
    
    Changes
    Upgrade of Database from Oracle 8i to 9i or 10G.
    
    Cause
    The failing function here is "pevm_MOVC_i", which is in the PL/SQL runtime code.
    From the stack trace it is clear that the pl/sql is run, the interpreter checks it and the
    the runtime code fails with this error.
    
    This is due to some limit in PL/SQL being exceeded. 
    This is possible when client application is not compatible with Oracle server.
    
    Fix
    Check if the client application is compatible with Oracle server.
    
    If you are using Forms 5 with Oracle 9i or 10G DB, then this error might occur
    because Forms 5 is neither compatible nor certified with 9i or 10G DB.
    
    If you intend to use 9i or 10G DB, you have to use Forms 9i.
    

      [引用]  [回复]

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

您可以使用这些 HTML 标签和属性: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>